Teams

Swafford DEL 3.0W

2025 Team Singles Tournament-NE · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-02vs Beck NE 3.0WLost 03
L#1 SinglesKatherine Swafford vs Margaret Burleson Jarvis4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTeresa Reed vs Elizabeth Gatlin6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMegan Wicker vs Savannah Koon3-6, 2-6
2025-03-01vs Upton EC 3.0WSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKatherine Swafford vs Leah Howard4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesTeresa Reed vs McKenzie Thatcher3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Black NC 3.0WSplit 11
L#2 SinglesMegan Wicker vs Heather McDonald0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesTeresa Reed vs Priscilla Hawkins6-4, 6-1
2025-02-28vs Johnson EC 3.0WWon 20
W#1 SinglesTeresa Reed vs Anna Dobbs6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMegan Wicker vs Janie Shields6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashley Cox
published 3.5
2.75
Teresa Reed
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.59
Megan Wicker
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.53
Katherine Swafford
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Reed + Megan Wicker5552% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Cox
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Reed
43W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.75
Megan Wicker
27W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59
Katherine Swafford
12W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.