Teams

Assaf Pinebelt 40-4.0

2024 Mixed 40&Over-PB · 4.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-28vs Black- TatumWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Johns / Kim Tatum vs Cindy Cochran / Brendan Fay6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Asmar / Bryan Howell vs Maya Stewart / Jay Henderson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Owen / Stephen Coleman vs Melanie C Fink / Jamie Massengale6-2, 6-1
2024-07-28vs Black- TatumWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Shemper / David Johns vs Sabrina Schuerger / Jamie Massengale6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKimberly Fortenberry / Francis Hemeter vs Danielle Black / Jay Henderson6-3, 6-2
2024-07-26vs Black- TatumWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Shemper / Bryan Howell vs Danielle Black / Jamie Massengale7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesFrancis Hemeter / Elizabeth Asmar vs Reagan Bryant / Jay Henderson6-2, 6-1
2024-07-14vs Black- TatumWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephen Coleman / Laura Owen vs Cindy Cochran / Brendan Fay6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Johns / Kimberly Fortenberry vs Danielle Black / Jamie Massengale6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEd Assaf / Kim Tatum vs Jay Henderson / Reagan Bryant6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Assaf Pinebelt 40-4.040111462
2Black- Tatum0411123143

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Bryan Howell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
Kim Tatum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Francis Hemeter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Stephen Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Elizabeth Asmar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Susan Shemper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Ed Assaf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kimberly Fortenberry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Howell
50W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
4.04
Kim Tatum
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Francis Hemeter
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Coleman
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Elizabeth Asmar
21W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Susan Shemper
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Ed Assaf
19W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kimberly Fortenberry
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.