Teams

Babcock National - Jicha

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 W Tuesday EVE

12 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-25vs UTC - MonahanLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Youmans / Karen Moss vs Christina Candelario / Melissa Dorr6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJulie LeVan / Dana Meyer vs Ana Monahan / Rebecca Kyle1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShelley Marcus / Lori Bieniek vs Wendy Olek / Teresa Ganley3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-18vs Cypress - ManiboLost 13
L#1 DoublesJulie LeVan / Denise Youmans vs Diana Metzger / Kelly James3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJackie Kunzler vs Nikki Tyndall3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Moss / Dana Meyer vs Christine Wiles / Marilyn Kole2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Nuthals / Christina Zimmerman vs Angela Sterious / Elaine Kearney2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-16vs UTC - MonahanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie LeVan / Anne Mcdonald vs Kim Shotwell / Ana Monahan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Moss / Karen Nuthals vs Pamella Attuso / Christina Candelario3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLori Bieniek / Beth Workman vs Diann Cimring / Janet Choisnet3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-11vs Heritage Palms - JohnsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Moss / Denise Youmans vs Lisa Pavichevich / Sylvia Moll6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLori Bieniek vs Lillyanna Peniza6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnne Mcdonald / Karen Nuthals vs Pamela Baumgart / Nancy Johnson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-04vs Legends - DelGrecoLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Moss / Denise Youmans vs Wendy Tauscheck / Donna Lee6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLori Bieniek vs Susan DelGreco2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Nuthals / Christina Zimmerman vs Elery Shaw / Kelly Bishop5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Mcdonald / Beth Workman vs Jeanne Meeks / Jamelyn Steenhoek1-6, 5-7
2025-01-31vs LEECHAR/Dingwall/40&Over3.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesKaren Nuthals / Karen Moss vs Colleen Doyle / Wendy Dingwall5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLori Bieniek vs Amanda Patten3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Workman / Theresa Raker vs Rhonda Allen / Leesa Cotton6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDenise Youmans / Dana Meyer vs Leticia Garcia / Jill Hoffman5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Tuesday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Denise Youmans
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Christina Zimmerman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Shelley Marcus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Julie LeVan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Karen Moss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Karen Nuthals
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Lori Bieniek
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Jackie Kunzler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.06
Theresa Raker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Anne Mcdonald
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Beth Workman
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Dana Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Workman + Theresa Raker7557% games+7.4% vs expected
Lori Bieniek + Beth Workman2845% games+0.6% vs expected
Shelley Marcus + Karen Moss3443% games−1.9% vs expected
Anne Mcdonald + Karen Nuthals1438% games−5.5% vs expected
Karen Moss + Denise Youmans4453% gamesnot enough data
Lori Bieniek + Theresa Raker134 matchesnot enough data
Beth Workman + Anne Mcdonald033 matchesnot enough data
Beth Workman + Karen Nuthals033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Youmans
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Christina Zimmerman
34W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Shelley Marcus
29W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Julie LeVan
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Karen Moss
14W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Karen Nuthals
8W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Lori Bieniek
118W–118L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Jackie Kunzler
36W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Theresa Raker
23W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Anne Mcdonald
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Beth Workman
17W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Dana Meyer
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.