Teams

UTC - Monahan

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 W Tuesday EVE

18 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-18vs Cypress - ManiboWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherri Campbell / Ana Monahan vs Diana Metzger / Angela Sterious6-2, 6-0
2025-03-11vs Heritage Palms - JohnsonWon 40
W#1 DoublesJanet Choisnet / Melissa Dorr vs Lillyanna Peniza / Melissa Scully6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPatricia Sareh vs Lisa Pavichevich6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Candelario / Teresa Ganley vs Karen Newman / Melanie Fawbush6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWendy Olek / Ann Boyd vs Beverly Bailey / Pamela Baumgart6-1, 6-3
2025-03-04vs Legends - DelGrecoWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherri Campbell / Ann Boyd vs Peggy Martin / Joanna Godden7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-02-25vs FMRC - MickWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristina Candelario / Melissa Dorr vs Dawn Mannina-Sanford / Laurie Mick7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDaniela Kloos vs Victoria Boyd6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPamella Attuso / Ann Boyd vs Virginia Mazman / Joanne Reilly6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiann Cimring / Sigalit Sphatt vs Kathy Blackburn / Margaret Sirtori6-2, 7-5
2025-02-11vs LEECHAR/Dingwall/40&Over3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Lowe / Sherri Campbell vs Cathy O'Neill / Beryl Gonzalez4-6, 2-6
2025-02-04vs Gateway - BlackmonLost 01
L#3 DoublesSigalit Sphatt / Jane Zito vs Donna Douglass / Peggy Inniss5-7, 3-6
2025-01-28vs Lake Kennedy - RiccioWon 10
W#3 DoublesJane Zito / Pamella Attuso vs Sue Savage / Denise Iannuzzi7-6, 6-0
2025-01-14vs Cypress - ManiboWon 10
W#3 DoublesSherri Campbell / Teresa Ganley vs Angela Sterious / Ann Biddison7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-07vs Heritage Palms - JohnsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatricia Sareh / Melissa Dorr vs Pamela Baumgart / Melanie Fawbush6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Shotwell / Pamella Attuso vs Lisa Pavichevich / Nancy Johnson6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Olek / Teresa Ganley vs Lillyanna Peniza / Karen Newman1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Tuesday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Ana Monahan
published 4
3.68
Patricia Sareh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Kim Shotwell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Christina Candelario
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.51
Melissa Dorr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Sherri Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Pamella Attuso
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jane Zito
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Wendy Olek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Daniela Kloos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Janet Choisnet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Ann Boyd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Teresa Ganley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Diann Cimring
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Mary Lowe
published
Lisa Yeslow
published
Rebecca Kyle
published
Sigalit Sphatt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Dorr + Christina Candelario8073% games+15.9% vs expected
Jane Zito + Sherri Campbell2348% gamesnot enough data
Sherri Campbell + Ann Boyd303 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Olek + Teresa Ganley213 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Olek + Christina Candelario303 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Ganley + Christina Candelario303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Monahan
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Patricia Sareh
26W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.68
Kim Shotwell
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.63
3.5
Christina Candelario
90W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
Melissa Dorr
25W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Sherri Campbell
198W–138L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Pamella Attuso
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
Jane Zito
186W–105L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Wendy Olek
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Daniela Kloos
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Janet Choisnet
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Ann Boyd
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Teresa Ganley
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Diann Cimring
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Mary Lowe
21W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
Lisa Yeslow
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Kyle
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sigalit Sphatt
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.