Teams

Gateway - Blackmon

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 W Tuesday EVE

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-25vs Heritage Palms - JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesCynthia Gentleman / Lucia Parvan vs Melanie Fawbush / Beverly Bailey6-3, 6-1
2025-01-30vs Lake Kennedy - RiccioWon 10
W#2 DoublesLucia Parvan / Jan Kahnke vs Denise Iannuzzi / Cathrin Matzen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-28vs LEECHAR/Dingwall/40&Over3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Conley / Lucia Parvan vs Wendy Dingwall / Nancy Aloia3-6, 0-6
2025-01-07vs Babcock National - JichaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLucia Parvan / Donna Douglass vs Karen Moss / Julie LeVan7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Tuesday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kristine Johnston
published
3.44
Lucia Parvan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Lisa Palmeri
published
3.31
Donna Douglass
published
3.21
Peggy Inniss
published
3.19
3.19
Jan Kahnke
published
3.16
Denise Weisinger
published 3.5
3.09
Elizabeth Ingalls
published
3.07
Alisha Daines
published 3.5
3.07
Linda Blackmon
published
3.03
Cynthia Gentleman
published 3.5
3.00
Debbie Conley
published 3.5
2.63
Denise Vaccaro
published 3
Sarah Catala
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Gentleman + Denise Weisinger044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Johnston
29W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
Lucia Parvan
84W–89L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lisa Palmeri
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Donna Douglass
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Peggy Inniss
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Bonita Spight-Williams
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jan Kahnke
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Denise Weisinger
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Elizabeth Ingalls
25W–33L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Alisha Daines
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Linda Blackmon
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cynthia Gentleman
2W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
3.5
Debbie Conley
1W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Denise Vaccaro
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Sarah Catala
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.