Teams

18 Over Served

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-07-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesDi-Yuan Tzeng / Jack Cook vs Krishna Alluri / Shyam Anantharaman6-2, 6-3
2021-07-09vs Mas Serve Aces (MSA)Won 20
W#1 SinglesSpencer Angstman vs Winfield Jones6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJack Cook / Di-Yuan Tzeng vs Brent Ayers / Scott Henson6-0, 6-0
2021-07-07vs Club Pura VidaWon 10
W#3 DoublesDouglas Shill / Trever Browne vs David Roberts / Roger Quarles6-3, 7-5
2021-07-05Won 10
W#2 SinglesSpencer Angstman vs Taylor Lucius6-2, 6-2
2021-06-23vs Miller TimeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeremy Canning / Danny Weeks vs Joshua Harbst / Leon Samuels6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSpencer Angstman vs Nathan Hines6-1, 6-3
2021-06-21vs Joint Chiefs of SmashSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeremy Canning / Danny Weeks vs James Guyton / Sven Bouapha4-6, 2-5
W#3 DoublesDi-Yuan Tzeng / Jack Cook vs Dave Keim / Patrick Kicklighter6-4, 6-1
2021-06-16vs Chak De Boise OverdriveWon 20
W#2 DoublesKirk Porritt / Jack Cook vs Chandra Angadi / Raja Kumar Varma Manthena6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSpencer Angstman vs Anil Tipirneni6-1, 6-1
2021-06-14vs Club Pura VidaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDanny Weeks / Mel Jackson vs Jeff Morrell / Jay Larsen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSpencer Angstman vs Jason Robertson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDi-Yuan Tzeng / Jack Cook vs Craig Gates / Jeffrey Habig6-3, 6-0
2021-06-07vs Mas Serve Aces (MSA)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJeremy Canning / Danny Weeks vs Mike Cooley / Michael Hermes6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDi-Yuan Tzeng / Jack Cook vs Dave Agler / Ben Shalz6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSpencer Angstman vs Russell Sauer6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-06-02vs Early RisersLost 01
L#3 DoublesDi-Yuan Tzeng / Douglas Shill vs Ben Rice / Eric Schindler0-6, 3-6
2021-05-26vs Miller TimeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDouglas Shill / Di-Yuan Tzeng vs Paul Brooks / Joshua Harbst2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeremy Canning / Jack Cook vs Todd Miller / William Goslovich7-6, 6-4
2021-05-24vs Joint Chiefs of SmashWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeremy Canning / Danny Weeks vs Bob Lounsbury / Robert Gabby6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKirk Porritt / Douglas Shill vs Patrick Kicklighter / Sven Bouapha6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
118 Over Served131511950505
2Early Risers122482257562
32 Shots and Done95403070597
4Miller Time86403076635
5Joint Chiefs of Smash59304090689

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Brian Rice
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4.5
4.02
Trever Browne
published 4
3.94
Rick Roby
published 4
3.91
3.87
Justin Endow
published 4
3.86
Mel Jackson
published 4
3.75
Kirk Porritt
published 4
Danny Weeks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Jeremy Canning
published 4
3.73
Di-Yuan Tzeng
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Jason Adkins
published 4
3.62
Jacob Sessions
published 4
3.33
Wallace Eastwood
published 3.5
Douglas Shill
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jack Cook
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Spencer Angstman
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mel Jackson + Kirk Porritt8457% games+14.9% vs expected
Rick Roby + Mel Jackson21363% games+9.7% vs expected
Jeremy Canning + Justin Endow321656% games+1.2% vs expected
Jacob Sessions + Justin Endow10658% games−0.3% vs expected
Rick Roby + Trever Browne2447% games−1.0% vs expected
Rick Roby + Kirk Porritt7355% games−2.6% vs expected
Jeremy Canning + Danny Weeks261255% games−3.5% vs expected
Jeremy Canning + Kirk Porritt16855% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Rice
89W–45L career · 16 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
4.16
4
Trever Browne
150W–115L career · no lines in 2021
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Rick Roby
293W–104L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Raymond Verveckken
63W–45L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Justin Endow
167W–107L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Mel Jackson
97W–42L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Kirk Porritt
221W–136L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Danny Weeks
61W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Jeremy Canning
164W–152L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Di-Yuan Tzeng
128W–74L career · 12 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Jason Adkins
92W–75L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Jacob Sessions
109W–73L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Wallace Eastwood
101W–126L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
Douglas Shill
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jack Cook
37W–21L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Spencer Angstman
27W–19L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.