Teams

King 18 + Combo 6.5

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 18 & OVER · Women 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-16vs Pierson 18+ 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesIsabelle Chammas / Ashley Woolwine vs Julia Griffin / Chloe Adel6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConnie West / Kelly Baugher vs Tracy Pierson / Stephanie Wasterval3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Smith / Gracie D'amico vs Sara Fagel / Brandy Baird3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pierson 18+ 6.51030023
2Pinder/Foster1030123
3Broach1021212
4Connett1021221
5Dameron 18+ combo1021229
6Holleman/Smith 18+ 6.50112427
7Jones combo 20260112428
8Branco/Sullivan0103631
9King 18 + Combo 6.50103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Abrielle Herbert
published 3.5
3.06
Maggie Blair
published
2.86
SIMONE AMATO
published
2.81
Jennifer Blanchard
published
2.72
Ashley Woolwine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kelly Baugher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Donna Sloan
published
2.63
Isabelle Chammas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Connie West
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Gracie D'amico
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Anissa King
published 3
2.42
Beth Saile
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Woolwine + Anissa King224 matchesnot enough data
Anissa King + Kelly Baugher224 matchesnot enough data
SIMONE AMATO + Connie West213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abrielle Herbert
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maggie Blair
28W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
SIMONE AMATO
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Jennifer Blanchard
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Ashley Woolwine
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Kelly Baugher
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Donna Sloan
4W–10L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Isabelle Chammas
11W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Connie West
20W–42L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Gracie D'amico
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Anissa King
26W–47L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
3
Beth Saile
19W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.