Teams

Pierson 18+ 6.5

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 18 & OVER · Women 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-09-02vs Pinder/FosterLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracy Pierson / Kelly Nerell vs Mary Simmons / Kathleen Henig6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulia Griffin / Chloe Adel vs Cameron Smithwick / Pati DeOliva6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSara Fagel / Stephanie Wasterval vs Evelyn Foster / Kathleen Curley1-6, 2-6
2026-08-16vs King 18 + Combo 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesJulia Griffin / Chloe Adel vs Isabelle Chammas / Ashley Woolwine7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracy Pierson / Stephanie Wasterval vs Connie West / Kelly Baugher6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSara Fagel / Brandy Baird vs Katie Smith / Gracie D'amico6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pierson 18+ 6.51030023
2Pinder/Foster1030123
3Broach1021212
4Connett1021221
5Dameron 18+ combo1021229
6Holleman/Smith 18+ 6.50112427
7Jones combo 20260112428
8Branco/Sullivan0103631
9King 18 + Combo 6.50103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Julia Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Kelly Nerell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Lisa Brandkamp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Mollie McKay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kathleen Graeser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Kelly Cole
published
3.10
Stephanie Wasterval
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Gabby Leonard
published 3.5
2.94
Jennifer Pennington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Tracy Pierson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Christine Pratt
published 3.5
2.85
Chloe Adel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Shanna Bradshaw
published
2.75
Brandy Baird
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Sara Fagel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Pierson + Kathleen Graeser2546% games+0.6% vs expected
Mollie McKay + Julia Griffin5551% games−1.4% vs expected
Lisa Brandkamp + Julia Griffin303 matchesnot enough data
Brandy Baird + Kelly Cole123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Griffin
23W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Kelly Nerell
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Lisa Brandkamp
30W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
Mollie McKay
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Kathleen Graeser
41W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Kelly Cole
50W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.14
Stephanie Wasterval
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Gabby Leonard
7W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Pennington
39W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Tracy Pierson
41W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
2.94
3.5
Christine Pratt
5W–16L career · type S · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.90
3
Chloe Adel
9W–5L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Shanna Bradshaw
13W–17L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Brandy Baird
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Sara Fagel
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.