Teams

Searle/55/4.0/MX/BVR

2025 LAF Mixed 55 & Over · 4.0 Laf (55&O) Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-03vs Gary/55/4.0/MX/BVRSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStuart Cornwell / Eileen Fruge vs Diana Gary / Sidney Landry4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRuth Larimer / James Vining vs Tanya Campbell / David Larriviere5-7, 2-6
2025-07-27vs Gary/55/4.0/MX/BVRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRuth Larimer / John Fontenot vs David Larriviere / Diana Taylor6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJason Quinlan / Janice Searle vs Diana Gary / Dwayne Searle6-1, 6-1
2025-07-20vs Gary/55/4.0/MX/BVRWon 20
W#1 DoublesJames Vining / Corina Melancon vs Diana Gary / Sidney Landry7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEileen Fruge / Boyd Snellgrove vs Sonia Taylor / David Larriviere6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Laf (55&O) Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
John Fontenot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Eileen Fruge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Jason Quinlan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Ruth Larimer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Boyd Snellgrove
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
James Vining
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Janice Searle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Corina Melancon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Stuart Cornwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eileen Fruge + Boyd Snellgrove224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Fontenot
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Eileen Fruge
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Jason Quinlan
17W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Ruth Larimer
21W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Boyd Snellgrove
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
James Vining
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Janice Searle
15W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Corina Melancon
10W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Stuart Cornwell
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.