Teams

Chambers-Cissell/JB/APCC

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 2.70 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-22vs McGee/JB/3OaksLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Hart / Mandy Folden vs Shannon Crocker / Elizabeth Cox6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKamri Herndon / Hannah Chambers vs Katie Reeves / Meghan Scott2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGloria Faircloth / Caitlin Sullins vs Alyssa Ishmael / Jami Sharp6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-13vs Kellums/JB/JCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMadison Matthews / Susan Hart vs Anna Koch / Evan Moore7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Smith / Hailey Knight vs Cari Dunham / Alexandra Kosmitis2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth McCartney / Olivia Pate vs Blair Cook / Madeline Cox4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-08vs Wade/JB/RPCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMandy Folden / Madison Matthews vs Lindi Wade / Amanda Windmeyer6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Smith / Megan Neugebauer vs Hannah Agudelo / Sarah Newbern2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesOlivia Pate / Caitlin Sullins vs Taylor Wildy / Jordan Loebach7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-30vs Parker/JB/3OAKSLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Hart / Mandy Folden vs Mollie Vance / Paige Parnell4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKamri Herndon / Hannah Chambers vs Crys Cook / Mallorie Hughes4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGloria Faircloth / Olivia Pate vs Tera Harpole / Caroline Wilson6-3, 6-3
2026-06-10vs Hydrick/JB/3OaksWon 21
W#1 DoublesMindy Lancaster / Mandy Folden vs Hope Higginbotham / Ella Bradsher6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMegan Neugebauer / Hannah Chambers vs Bobbi Hydrick / Rachael Rodery6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesOlivia Pate / Caitlin Sullins vs Audra McClung / Kylie DeVries3-6, 1-6
2026-06-04vs Roberts/JB/3OaksLost 12
L#1 DoublesMandy Folden / Susan Hart vs Leah Willett / Catherine Frans2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHannah Chambers / Hailey Knight vs Jenny Box / Danae Sandusky6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBeth McCartney / Gloria Faircloth vs April Grove / Brandy Johnston0-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kellums/JB/JCC4210821163
2Wade/JB/RPCC2481022157
3Chambers-Cissell/JB/APCC2471123175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Shelley Cissell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Mindy Lancaster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Susan Hart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Madison Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Mandy Folden
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.89
Hailey Knight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Megan Neugebauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Kamri Herndon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Beth McCartney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.47
Gloria Faircloth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.45
Hannah Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.39
Olivia Pate
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Caitlin Sullins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth McCartney + Caitlin Sullins7450% games+2.2% vs expected
Kamri Herndon + Hailey Knight314 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Folden + Susan Hart123 matchesnot enough data
Beth McCartney + Olivia Pate213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelley Cissell
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Mindy Lancaster
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Susan Hart
2W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Madison Matthews
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Mandy Folden
15W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Hailey Knight
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Megan Neugebauer
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
Kamri Herndon
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
2.5
Beth McCartney
29W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.58
2.5
Gloria Faircloth
8W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.47
3
Hannah Chambers
32W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45
Olivia Pate
24W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.39
2.5
Caitlin Sullins
20W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.