Teams

Parker/JB/3OAKS

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-08-17vs Ragsdale/JB/3OaksWon 20
W#2 DoublesSarah Abbott / Mollie Vance vs Megan Ragsdale / Karysta Sturges6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrandee Kyle / Jamie Smith vs Morgan Davis-Daniel / Kristen Ferguson6-3, 7-6
2026-08-04vs Wade/JB/RPCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Fancher / Paige Parnell vs Hannah Agudelo / Sarah Newbern6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCrys Cook / Olivia Smith vs Lindsay Privett / Haley Jones3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Myers / Tera Harpole vs Taylor Wildy / Melanie Burnett2-6, 5-7
2026-07-30vs McGee/JB/3OaksLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Tyson / Jordan Adams vs Destiny McGee / Meghan Scott6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelsy Markum / Brandee Kyle vs Elizabeth Cox / Katie Reeves6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTera Harpole / Niki Carver vs Alyssa Ishmael / Lydia Thornton2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-29vs Ragsdale/JB/3OaksWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Tyson / Mollie Vance vs Catherine Frans / Karysta Sturges7-5, 6-2
2026-07-27vs Hydrick/JB/3OaksSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCrys Cook / Brandee Kyle vs Hope Higginbotham / Rachael Rodery6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTera Harpole / Caroline Wilson vs Audra McClung / Kylie DeVries4-6, 4-6
2026-07-21vs McClain/JB/JCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesHannah Agudelo / Brandee Kyle vs Lauren McClain / Alexandra Kosmitis4-6, 1-6
2026-07-15vs Fulmer-Smith/JB/JCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesJordan Adams / Lori Tyson vs Evan Moore / Shannon Crocker6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKelsy Markum / Jamie Smith vs Caroline Rose / Courtney Watkins6-2, 6-3
2026-07-09vs Roberts/JB/3OaksWon 30
W#1 DoublesMollie Vance / Jennifer Fancher vs Catherine Frans / Leah Willett6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelsy Markum / Olivia Smith vs Himaja Balakrishnan / Joan Khilling7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTera Harpole / Michelle Myers vs Brandy Johnston / Kristen Scarlett6-2, 6-0
2026-07-08vs Fulmer-Smith/JB/JCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesSarah Abbott / Mollie Vance vs Evan Moore / Chelsey Henson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelsy Markum / Jamie Smith vs Nicole Townsend / Courtney Watkins6-3, 6-2
2026-06-30vs Chambers-Cissell/JB/APCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMollie Vance / Paige Parnell vs Susan Hart / Mandy Folden6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCrys Cook / Mallorie Hughes vs Kamri Herndon / Hannah Chambers6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTera Harpole / Caroline Wilson vs Gloria Faircloth / Olivia Pate3-6, 3-6
2026-06-28vs Cissell/JB/RPCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesMollie Vance / Lori Tyson vs Haley Davis / Stephanie Romero7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrandee Kyle / Jamie Smith vs Haley Jones / Hannah Chambers6-3, 6-4
2026-06-22vs Kellums/JB/JCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Abbott / Mollie Vance vs Frances Anthony / Anna Koch6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrandee Kyle / Kelsy Markum vs Cari Dunham / Taylor Kaloghirou6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTera Harpole / Michelle Myers vs Blair Cook / Katie Leonard4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Parker/JB/3OAKS511537119
2McClain/JB/JCC3381024188
3Fulmer-Smith/JB/JCC2471123161

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Lori Tyson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Mollie Vance
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.26
Sarah Abbott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Paige Parnell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
2.91
Crys Cook
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Brandee Kyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Kelsy Markum
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.78
Mallorie Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Niki Carver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Tera Harpole
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Caroline Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Crys Cook + Kelsy Markum5062% games+9.4% vs expected
Mollie Vance + Sarah Abbott7066% games+7.7% vs expected
Lori Tyson + Sarah Abbott1543% games+5.5% vs expected
Caroline Wilson + Tera Harpole1438% games−5.5% vs expected
Lori Tyson + Mollie Vance303 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Wilson + Niki Carver123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Tyson
18W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Mollie Vance
21W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
Sarah Abbott
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Paige Parnell
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
Kelly Dionne Moody Parker
24W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Crys Cook
21W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Brandee Kyle
11W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kelsy Markum
11W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Mallorie Hughes
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Niki Carver
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Tera Harpole
24W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Caroline Wilson
12W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.