Teams

Cissell/JB/RPCC

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-05vs Fulmer-Smith/JB/JCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesAbigail Cissell / Cortni Thomas vs Hannah Fulmer / Maddie Booth6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMandy Folden / Haley Davis vs Nan Smith / Chelsey Henson5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLindsay Privett / Haley Jones vs Alley Bell / Caroline Rose3-6, 3-6
2026-07-21vs Ragsdale/JB/3OaksLost 02
L#1 DoublesShelley Cissell / Abigail Cissell vs Tabitha Inboden / Hailey Mitchener5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Romero / Ashlee Gill vs Leah Willett / Catherine Frans4-6, 6-7
2026-07-14vs Ragsdale/JB/3OaksWon 30
W#1 DoublesBella Seeman / Cortni Thomas vs Tabitha Inboden / Hailey Mitchener6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephanie Romero / Mandy Folden vs Karysta Sturges / Leah Willett7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSarah Milton / Hannah Chambers vs Candace Sanders / Kristen Ferguson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-29vs McClain/JB/JCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesCortni Thomas / Bella Seeman vs Rebecca Harrington / Easton McDaniel6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMandy Folden / Andrea Seeman vs Sara Gay / Frances Anthony6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCrys Cook / Sarah Milton vs Alexandra Kosmitis / Rosemary Cabe6-2, 6-1
2026-06-28vs Parker/JB/3OAKSLost 12
W#1 DoublesAbigail Cissell / Cortni Thomas vs Margo Hafner / Lindsey Cato6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHaley Davis / Stephanie Romero vs Mollie Vance / Lori Tyson6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHaley Jones / Hannah Chambers vs Brandee Kyle / Jamie Smith3-6, 4-6
2026-06-09vs McClain/JB/JCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesShelley Cissell / Abigail Cissell vs Hadley Hilburn / Easton McDaniel6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStephanie Romero / Ashlee Gill vs Mallory Hurst / Sara Gay6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHannah Chambers / Sarah Milton vs Rosemary Cabe / Lauren McClain6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Cortni Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Bella Seeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Abigail Cissell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Shelley Cissell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Haley Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Ashlee Gill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Andrea Seeman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Stephanie Romero
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Mandy Folden
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.12
Sarah Milton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Crys Cook
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Lindsay Privett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Haley Jones
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.44
Hannah Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashlee Gill + Stephanie Romero5558% games+12.8% vs expected
Shelley Cissell + Abigail Cissell11259% games+0.1% vs expected
Lindsay Privett + Haley Jones4257% games−4.5% vs expected
Cortni Thomas + Abigail Cissell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cortni Thomas
16W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Bella Seeman
7W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Abigail Cissell
17W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Shelley Cissell
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Haley Davis
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Ashlee Gill
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrea Seeman
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
3.15
Stephanie Romero
21W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Mandy Folden
11W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Sarah Milton
31W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Crys Cook
21W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
Lindsay Privett
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
Haley Jones
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Hannah Chambers
30W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.