Teams

Ragsdale/JB/3Oaks

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-17vs Parker/JB/3OAKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesTabitha Inboden / Hailey Mitchener vs Maggie Playter / Abby Rogers4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Ragsdale / Karysta Sturges vs Sarah Abbott / Mollie Vance2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMorgan Davis-Daniel / Kristen Ferguson vs Brandee Kyle / Jamie Smith3-6, 6-7
2026-08-16vs Fulmer-Smith/JB/JCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Eggers / Tabitha Inboden vs Hannah Fulmer / LINDSAY TROTTER0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Frans / Megan Ragsdale vs Nan Smith / Shannon Crocker6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCandace Sanders / Kristen Ferguson vs Courtney Watkins / Alley Bell3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-08-13vs McClain/JB/JCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesTabitha Inboden / Megan Ragsdale vs Rebecca Harrington / Mindy Lancaster2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Frans / Lindi Wade vs Frances Anthony / Sara Gay4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMorgan Davis-Daniel / Candace Sanders vs Alexandra Kosmitis / Lauren McClain6-2, 7-5
2026-07-29vs Parker/JB/3OAKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Eggers / Hailey Mitchener vs Margo Hafner / Abby Rogers5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Frans / Karysta Sturges vs Lori Tyson / Mollie Vance5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCandace Sanders / Kristen Ferguson vs Hannah Agudelo / Jamie Smith2-6, 1-6
2026-07-21vs Cissell/JB/RPCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesTabitha Inboden / Hailey Mitchener vs Shelley Cissell / Abigail Cissell7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeah Willett / Catherine Frans vs Stephanie Romero / Ashlee Gill6-4, 7-6
2026-07-14vs Cissell/JB/RPCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTabitha Inboden / Hailey Mitchener vs Bella Seeman / Cortni Thomas1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKarysta Sturges / Leah Willett vs Stephanie Romero / Mandy Folden5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCandace Sanders / Kristen Ferguson vs Sarah Milton / Hannah Chambers3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Hailey Mitchener
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Megan Ragsdale
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.55
Tabitha Inboden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Heather Eggers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Leah Willett
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.03
Lindi Wade
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Karysta Sturges
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Morgan Davis-Daniel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Candace Sanders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace Sanders + Morgan Davis-Daniel5260% games+2.8% vs expected
Hailey Mitchener + Heather Eggers224 matchesnot enough data
Hailey Mitchener + Tabitha Inboden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hailey Mitchener
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Megan Ragsdale
15W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
Tabitha Inboden
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Heather Eggers
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Leah Willett
10W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
Lindi Wade
22W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Karysta Sturges
5W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.02
Morgan Davis-Daniel
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Candace Sanders
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.