Teams

Fulmer-Smith/JB/JCC

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-17vs McClain/JB/JCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesHannah Fulmer / LINDSAY TROTTER vs Hadley Hilburn / Rebecca Harrington6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNan Smith / Alley Bell vs Lauren McClain / Alexandra Kosmitis6-2, 6-3
2026-08-16vs Ragsdale/JB/3OaksLost 12
L#1 DoublesHannah Fulmer / LINDSAY TROTTER vs Heather Eggers / Tabitha Inboden6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNan Smith / Shannon Crocker vs Catherine Frans / Megan Ragsdale1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney Watkins / Alley Bell vs Candace Sanders / Kristen Ferguson6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2026-08-05vs Cissell/JB/RPCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesHannah Fulmer / Maddie Booth vs Abigail Cissell / Cortni Thomas2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNan Smith / Chelsey Henson vs Mandy Folden / Haley Davis7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAlley Bell / Caroline Rose vs Lindsay Privett / Haley Jones6-3, 6-3
2026-07-27vs McClain/JB/JCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLINDSAY TROTTER / Maddie Booth vs Mindy Lancaster / Hadley Hilburn1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChelsey Henson / Evan Moore vs Mallory Hurst / Leigh Montgomery6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNicole Townsend / Nan Smith vs Lauren McClain / Jordan Powell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-15vs Parker/JB/3OAKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaddie Booth / Hannah Fulmer vs Lindsey Cato / Maggie Playter1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEvan Moore / Shannon Crocker vs Jordan Adams / Lori Tyson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Rose / Courtney Watkins vs Kelsy Markum / Jamie Smith2-6, 3-6
2026-07-08vs Parker/JB/3OAKSLost 03
L#1 DoublesHannah Fulmer / LINDSAY TROTTER vs Margo Hafner / Abby Rogers6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEvan Moore / Chelsey Henson vs Sarah Abbott / Mollie Vance4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Townsend / Courtney Watkins vs Kelsy Markum / Jamie Smith3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Parker/JB/3OAKS511537119
2McClain/JB/JCC3381024188
3Fulmer-Smith/JB/JCC2471123161

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Hannah Fulmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Maddie Booth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
LINDSAY TROTTER
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Evan Moore
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Chelsey Henson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Nan Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Alley Bell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Nicole Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Courtney Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Caroline Rose
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Fulmer + Maddie Booth4352% games+1.5% vs expected
Hannah Fulmer + LINDSAY TROTTER123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Fulmer
9W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Maddie Booth
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
LINDSAY TROTTER
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Evan Moore
4W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Chelsey Henson
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Nan Smith
18W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Alley Bell
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Nicole Townsend
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Courtney Watkins
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Caroline Rose
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.