Teams

WP-G NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs CACM BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesKim Eikenberry / Kelli Santisi vs Amanda Sheehan / Janice Kercheville6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Craig vs Maya Pingle Trinen3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSara Singh / Molly Withers vs Rene Moore / Izabela Rydel6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKrissy Gilhooly / Lindsay Koch vs Chandra Jones / Sarah Payne4-6, 5-2
2026-07-06vs CM ORANGELost 04
L#1 DoublesAnne Sibree / Kelli Santisi vs Mary Fitzpatrick / Aileen Worden3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Craig vs Courtney Bhat4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSara Singh / Kate Marshall vs Lydia Tzagoloff / Stephanie Sabga7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErin Schlosser / Jennifer I vs Margot Kelly / Anne Gordon7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-29vs GPTC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMolly Withers / Sara Singh vs Kristin Baird / Shannon Brooks6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKate Marshall vs Molly Holland6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnne Sibree / Jennifer I vs Amy Parent / Christy Wilson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Craig / Krissy Gilhooly vs Heather Colliander / Julie Pellet4-6, 1-6
2026-06-22vs DTC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMolly Withers / Laurie Batchelder Adams vs Kelli Barton / Evelyn Price6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnne Sibree vs Keri Shimek1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKate Marshall / Lindsay Koch vs Alyson Kempton / Alexis Sutton3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesErin Schlosser / Jennifer I vs Melissa Saslow / Ashley Stevens6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-15vs GTC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJessica Craig / Laurie Batchelder Adams vs Brenda Emerson / Carissa Hornbeck2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKim Eikenberry vs Jada Dixon6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMolly Withers / Erin Schlosser vs Leah Johnson / Rachel Deloach6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKate Marshall / Krissy Gilhooly vs Sara Springer / Jessica Mills3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-08vs CACM REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesJessica Craig / Laurie Batchelder Adams vs Sheryl Chandler / Victoria Anderson2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMolly Withers vs Michelle MacK6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKim Eikenberry / Kelli Santisi vs Suzanne Booth / Nancy Botiller6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Koch / Jennifer I vs Elizabeth Anderman / Julie McClung4-6, 3-6
2026-06-01vs DTP GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSara Singh / Molly Withers vs Kelly Dobson / Stacie Parr7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKate Marshall vs Caren Elenowitz1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKim Eikenberry / Kelli Santisi vs Muffy Steinhoff / Barbara Vander Wall6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnne Sibree / Krissy Gilhooly vs Kelli Kelsall / Elizabeth Russell6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Molly Withers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Laurie Batchelder Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kelli Santisi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Sara Singh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Jessica Craig
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.64
Lindsay Koch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Kate Marshall
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Krissy Gilhooly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Anne Sibree
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Jennifer I
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.54
Kim Eikenberry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.52
Erin Schlosser
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Withers + Sara Singh5163% games+4.5% vs expected
Laurie Batchelder Adams + Jessica Craig5350% games−2.8% vs expected
Sara Singh + Kate Marshall1744% games−4.4% vs expected
Erin Schlosser + Kate Marshall1539% games−7.8% vs expected
Kim Eikenberry + Kelli Santisi123 matchesnot enough data
Kate Marshall + Jessica Craig033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Withers
27W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Laurie Batchelder Adams
24W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
Kelli Santisi
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Sara Singh
17W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Jessica Craig
12W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65
Lindsay Koch
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.64
Kate Marshall
7W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
2.60
Krissy Gilhooly
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Anne Sibree
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Jennifer I
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
2.56
Kim Eikenberry
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Erin Schlosser
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.