Teams

CACM BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs WP-G NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmanda Sheehan / Janice Kercheville vs Kim Eikenberry / Kelli Santisi7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMaya Pingle Trinen vs Jessica Craig6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRene Moore / Izabela Rydel vs Sara Singh / Molly Withers1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChandra Jones / Sarah Payne vs Krissy Gilhooly / Lindsay Koch6-4, 2-5
2026-07-06vs GTC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmanda Sheehan / Sarah Payne vs Kaye Wonder / Carissa Hornbeck6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesShanna Weber vs Jada Dixon6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaya Pingle Trinen / Beth Bean vs Brenda Emerson / Rachel Deloach4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRene Moore / Christina Ziccardi vs Leah Johnson / Julie Woodle6-0, 6-2
2026-06-29vs CM ORANGESplit 22
L#1 DoublesAmanda Sheehan / Janice Kercheville vs Margot Kelly / Jennifer Cook4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMaya Pingle Trinen vs Anne Gordon6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesIzabela Rydel / Rene Moore vs Aileen Worden / Polly Warner4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChandra Jones / Christina Ziccardi vs Ellen Putze / Bethany Chang2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-22vs CACM REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesJanice Kercheville / Christina Ziccardi vs Victoria Anderson / Sheryl Chandler6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesIzabela Rydel vs Julie McClung5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle McGinty - White / Beth Bean vs Leigh Kingman / Blair OConnor3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Payne / Chandra Jones vs Nancy Botiller / Elizabeth Anderman6-3, 6-4
2026-06-15vs GPTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Payne / Amanda Sheehan vs Renee Morris / Jessica Thomas5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShanna Weber vs Heather Colliander6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanice Kercheville / Rene Moore vs Christy Wilson / Wendy Berhman3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChandra Jones / Michelle McGinty - White vs Molly Holland / Kristin Baird2-6, 3-6
2026-06-08vs DTP GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmanda Sheehan / Janice Kercheville vs Elizabeth Russell / Kelli Kelsall6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMaya Pingle Trinen vs Akane DiFiore7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIzabela Rydel / Rene Moore vs Caren Elenowitz / Kelly Dobson4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesShanna Weber / Christina Ziccardi vs Stacie Parr / Tammie Martin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-01vs DTC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesSarah Payne / Amanda Sheehan vs Kelli Barton / Jennifer Parsons4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesShanna Weber vs Keri Shimek1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Kercheville / Christina Ziccardi vs Katie Keating / Heather la Montagne1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesChandra Jones / Beth Bean vs Jill Stein / Becky Gilligan4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Christina Ziccardi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.87
Janice Kercheville
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Michelle McGinty - White
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Shanna Weber
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Amanda Sheehan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Rene Moore
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.66
Izabela Rydel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.66
Maya Pingle Trinen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.64
Beth Bean
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Justine McKinzie
published
2.32
Chandra Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Kercheville + Amanda Sheehan5259% games+6.2% vs expected
Amanda Sheehan + Christina Ziccardi4255% games−1.2% vs expected
Rene Moore + Izabela Rydel51045% games−3.5% vs expected
Maya Pingle Trinen + Beth Bean2644% games−9.6% vs expected
Janice Kercheville + Christina Ziccardi314 matchesnot enough data
Rene Moore + Christina Ziccardi303 matchesnot enough data
Shanna Weber + Maya Pingle Trinen033 matchesnot enough data
Shanna Weber + Christina Ziccardi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christina Ziccardi
19W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Janice Kercheville
63W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
Michelle McGinty - White
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Shanna Weber
34W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Amanda Sheehan
24W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Rene Moore
19W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
Izabela Rydel
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Maya Pingle Trinen
14W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Beth Bean
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Justine McKinzie
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
2.5
Chandra Jones
30W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.