Teams

TTA GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs CVTA GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKaren Walter / Maggie Mastay vs Louise Fowler / Jennifer Dingman2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesShonee Lesh vs Jacqueline Rosains6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJennifer Arbuckle / Stacy Hudson vs Maggie Brubaker / Terry Tessier6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Tracy Wiske vs Holly Sprenkle / Lori Bird6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-07vs CVTA BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesKaren Walter / Maggie Mastay vs Rashmi Anki / Lakshmi Vegesna6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesShonee Lesh vs Meredith Rafter6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Dini / Jennifer Arbuckle vs Steffani Hafner / Cheryl Cavanaugh2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah White / Carey Price vs Michelle Gleason / Molly Wilson6-1, 6-2
2025-06-30vs BCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesJenna McCormick / Julie Aragon vs Kristin Kalush / Anna Bertagnolli6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShonee Lesh / Tammi Chiappone vs Xenia Rutherford / Annette Wright3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaggie Mastay / Tracy Wiske vs Lisa Lund-Brown / Paige Walker7-5, 6-2
2025-06-23vs LAC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesMelissa Dini / Carey Price vs Laura Harris / Lisa Rue6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJenna McCormick vs Caitlin McTague6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Julie Aragon vs Kristi Mark / Lindsay Roland6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStacy Hudson / Karen Walter vs MARY WEISFOUT / Laura Wonnacott6-3, 6-2
2025-06-16vs NJ GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracy Wiske / Julie Aragon vs Jennifer Davis / Christine Loehr3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Arbuckle / Jenna McCormick vs Laura Garrido / Sara Leaver6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaren Walter / Maggie Mastay vs Abbey Wood / Tanya Hartney0-6, 0-6
2025-06-09vs BRMST REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesStacy Hudson / Sarah White vs Colleen Estrada / Lisa Shaver3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJenna McCormick vs Sarah Monzyk1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Wiske / Karen Walter vs Melissa Rawsky / Leslie Gaiser2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Aragon / Maggie Mastay vs Tammie Donohoe / Alden Perkins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-02vs MEA NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Arbuckle / Melissa Dini vs Mary Sznewajs / Mandy Sladden3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShonee Lesh vs Julie Lockwood6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarey Price / Sarah White vs Shannon Ross / Susan Peterson3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesTammi Chiappone / Jenna McCormick vs Brendan Ash / Charity Sevian7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Melissa Dini
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Jennifer Arbuckle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Shonee Lesh
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Jenna McCormick
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.73
Tammi Chiappone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Carey Price
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Stacy Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Julie Aragon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.57
Tracy Wiske
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Maggie Mastay
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Hudson + Melissa Dini4166% games+10.6% vs expected
Carey Price + Melissa Dini6356% games+9.2% vs expected
Maggie Mastay + Shonee Lesh8455% games+9.0% vs expected
Jennifer Arbuckle + Melissa Dini361758% games+5.3% vs expected
Tracy Wiske + Tammi Chiappone6650% games+0.5% vs expected
Stacy Hudson + Tammi Chiappone131947% games−1.5% vs expected
Julie Aragon + Carey Price6947% games−2.4% vs expected
Julie Aragon + Tammi Chiappone5650% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Melissa Dini
73W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Jennifer Arbuckle
54W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Shonee Lesh
100W–68L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Jenna McCormick
41W–68L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Tammi Chiappone
91W–91L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Carey Price
36W–78L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Stacy Hudson
51W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.62
Julie Aragon
37W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Tracy Wiske
56W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Maggie Mastay
41W–66L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.