Teams

NJ GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15vs BCC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesSara Leaver / Abbey Wood vs Catherine Ruelas / Lauren Christin6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTanya Hartney vs Cyndy McClung7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Davis / Kristin Walters vs Juliana Cohen / Lalenia Quinlan Aweida7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristine Loehr / Heather Young vs Lisa Lund-Brown / Paige Walker3-6, 4-6
2025-07-07vs LAC GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesSara Leaver / Susan Tomlinson vs Lisa Rue / Laura Wonnacott1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTanya Hartney vs Caitlin McTague6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Walters / Jennifer Davis vs Laura Harris / Kristi Mark7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Kelly / Laura Garrido vs Stacy Welding / Catherine Capparelli6-3, 6-1
2025-06-30vs MEA NAVYWon 40
W#1 DoublesLisa Kellogg / Kristin Walters vs Shannon Ross / Susan Wu6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTanya Hartney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Loehr / Abbey Wood vs Brendan Ash / Julie Lockwood6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Kelly / Susan Tomlinson vs Susan Peterson / Charity Sevian6-4, 7-5
2025-06-23vs BRMST REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesSara Leaver / Abbey Wood vs Melissa Rawsky / Sarah Monzyk6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTanya Hartney vs Jennifer Cooper6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Davis / Lisa Kellogg vs Colleen Estrada / Kirsty Lockhart6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Garrido / Heather Young vs Cynthia Manley / Alden Perkins2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-06-16vs TTA GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Davis / Christine Loehr vs Tracy Wiske / Julie Aragon6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesHeather Young vs Sarah White2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLaura Garrido / Sara Leaver vs Jennifer Arbuckle / Jenna McCormick3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAbbey Wood / Tanya Hartney vs Karen Walter / Maggie Mastay6-0, 6-0
2025-06-09vs CVTA GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesJennifer Davis / Kristin Walters vs Louise Fowler / Maggie Brubaker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHeather Young vs Jacqueline Rosains7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Kellogg / Susan Tomlinson vs Nancy Stern / Heather Dragon Graham6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaura Kelly / Christine Loehr vs Lori Bird / Teresa Chapman6-4, 6-3
2025-06-02vs CVTA BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaura Garrido / Kristin Walters vs Steffani Hafner / Meredith Rafter6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesHeather Young vs Cheryl Cavanaugh4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSusan Tomlinson / Abbey Wood vs Michelle Gleason / Lakshmi Vegesna6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLisa Kellogg / Laura Kelly vs Rashmi Anki / Jenny Pergola6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Lisa Kellogg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Heather Young
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Sara Leaver
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Tanya Hartney
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.90
Abbey Wood
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Jennifer Davis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
Laura Garrido
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Christine Loehr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Kristin Walters
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.56
Susan Tomlinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Young + Kristin Walters6263% games+16.3% vs expected
Susan Tomlinson + Abbey Wood5161% games+12.6% vs expected
Jennifer Davis + Sara Leaver4160% games+4.1% vs expected
Jennifer Davis + Lisa Kellogg8851% games+3.8% vs expected
Laura Garrido + Kristin Walters5650% games+3.8% vs expected
Laura Garrido + Jennifer Davis5651% games+2.3% vs expected
Heather Young + Jennifer Davis7159% games+1.1% vs expected
Jennifer Davis + Christine Loehr243345% games+0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Kellogg
118W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Heather Young
29W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Sara Leaver
110W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Tanya Hartney
73W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Abbey Wood
20W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Jennifer Davis
156W–113L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Laura Garrido
97W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Christine Loehr
122W–112L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Kristin Walters
40W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Susan Tomlinson
37W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.