Teams

Varner/Davis 3.5W 55s Fri AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-03-29vs Porter/Jones 3.5W 55s Fri AMLost 01
L#3 DoublesShelby Rhyne / Brenda Varner vs Wanda Davis / Robin Smith4-6, 3-6
2024-03-15vs Gossage 3.5W 55s Fri AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Varner / Debbie Clancy vs Brenda MacFadden / Pam Ferrell6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Teresa Cruz
published
3.42
Shelby Rhyne
published
3.42
Debbie Clancy
published 3.5
3.35
Margaret Reynolds
published
3.24
Suzanne Perez
published
3.23
Britt Molitoris
published 3.5
3.17
Sue Blanchard
published
3.04
Sherry Gibson
published
2.92
Rhonda Glenn
published
2.91
Brenda Varner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Amy Dulin
published 3
2.81
Donna Davis
published
2.80
Faye Halvorsen
published
Cathy Taney
published 3
Patty Garner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Clancy + Teresa Cruz5358% games+7.3% vs expected
Suzanne Perez + Debbie Clancy033 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Glenn + Sue Blanchard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teresa Cruz
27W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.56
Shelby Rhyne
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Debbie Clancy
30W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Margaret Reynolds
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Suzanne Perez
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Britt Molitoris
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Sue Blanchard
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Sherry Gibson
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
Rhonda Glenn
13W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Brenda Varner
137W–87L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Amy Dulin
8W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Donna Davis
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Faye Halvorsen
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Cathy Taney
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patty Garner
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.