Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW4.5A

2026 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.5

23 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-03vs LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesRosie Habib / Fran Compagno vs Donna Kaneko / Maisun Totah6-3, 6-0
2026-02-23vs LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesCassandra Harms vs Allison Bartlett3-6, 6-7
2026-02-21vs SUNNYVALE MTC 40AW4.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesRosie Habib / Fran Compagno vs Emese Erdos / Tara Garneau2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-15vs LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesIke Bunanta / Liz Pearne vs Maisun Totah / Donna Kaneko4-6, 0-6
2026-01-26vs LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesCassandra Harms vs Allison Bartlett2-6, 3-6
2026-01-24vs LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.5ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesHolly Gentle / Liz Pearne vs Allison Bartlett / Gwynne Rolla4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesFran Compagno / Cassandra Harms vs Maisun Totah / Christine Dumery6-2, 6-3
2026-01-12vs SUNNYVALE MTC 40AW4.5AWon 20
W#1 SinglesCassandra Harms vs Emese Erdos6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHolly Gentle / Liz Pearne vs Sally Cella / Lynn Stanghellini6-0, 6-4
2026-01-06vs LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Norden / Liz Pearne vs Tara Garneau / Peggy Schatzman4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings32 teams · Women's 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 40AW4.5A0723514162
2BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 40AW4.5A0791944297
3FIG GARDEN 40AW4.5A0752348309
4SUNNYVALE MTC 40AW4.5A08171534273
5SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40AW4.5B0892348317
6CARMEL V RANCH 40AW4.5A09251126261
7SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40AW4.5C0929727294
8BERKELEY TC 40AW4.5A09142249362
9RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40AW4.5A09132351338
10GILROY TENNIS CLUB/GILROY TENNIS CTR 40AW4.5A0982859386
11FOOTHILL COLL 40AW4.5A010291125260
12MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 40AW4.5A010291126287
13MILLS COLLEGE 40AW4.5A010271330305
14JOHNSON RANCH 40AW4.5A010281231300
15BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AW4.5A010271332291
16TIBURON PEN C 40AW4.5A010281233337
17WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW4.5A010261433320
18ST MARY 40AW4.5A010271334331
19IMPERIAL TC 40AW4.5A010231739329
20CLAREMONT R and S 40AW4.5A010221841335
21BROADSTONE RC 40AW4.5A010261441349
22RAFAEL RC 40AW4.5A010221845350
23BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW4.5A010221846372
24PETALUMA TA/LEGHORNS PK 40AW4.5A010182247356
25VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 40AW4.5A010182248378
26LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.5A010182252394
27SHARON HTS CC 40AW4.5A010162454382
28BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AW4.5B010132760409
29HARBOR PT 40AW4.5A010122863431
30WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW4.5B01093167446
31GOLD RIVER RC 40AW4.5A01063468429
32MENLO ATHERTON HS 40AW4.5A01063470461

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Holly Gentle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.32
Carol Wang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Fran Compagno
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.28
Lisa Oktavia
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
4.23
Erika Byrum
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.23
Kar Yee Fransham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.22
Beverly Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.21
Yuko Mihara
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.21
Cassandra Harms
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Tula Kraiser
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published
4.18
Zeynep Chasseray
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.15
Alicia van Fleteren
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Sumeeta Vasishta
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.13
Lina Li
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.09
Letha Tran
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
4.08
Kelly Uyema
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
4.01
Nicole Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.98
Laura Norden
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.95
Jie Kong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Ike Bunanta
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.84
Liz Pearne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rosie Habib
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Oktavia + Erika Byrum5263% games+6.1% vs expected
Kelly Uyema + Lina Li2542% games−15.0% vs expected
Liz Pearne + Holly Gentle213 matchesnot enough data
Beverly Christensen + Ike Bunanta123 matchesnot enough data
Alicia van Fleteren + Sumeeta Vasishta303 matchesnot enough data
Kar Yee Fransham + Sumeeta Vasishta303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Oktavia + Yuko Mihara303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Gentle
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
4.41
4.5
Carol Wang
5W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Fran Compagno
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
Lisa Oktavia
41W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
Erika Byrum
21W–15L career · 12 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Kar Yee Fransham
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Beverly Christensen
9W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Yuko Mihara
9W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Cassandra Harms
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Tula Kraiser
10W–9L career · 10 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.20
Zeynep Chasseray
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Alicia van Fleteren
15W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
4.15
Sumeeta Vasishta
24W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
4.14
Lina Li
11W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
Letha Tran
17W–21L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
4.09
Kelly Uyema
20W–19L career · 13 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
Nicole Stephens
29W–36L career · 26 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
Laura Norden
12W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
Jie Kong
12W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.95
Ike Bunanta
5W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.94
Liz Pearne
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.84
Miyuki Motegi Tibbetts
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rosie Habib
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.