Teams

BROADSTONE RC 40AW4.5A

2026 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-12vs GOLD RIVER RC 40AW4.5AWon 31
L#1 DoublesAlissa Watts / Fritzie Dorais vs McKenzie Helvick / So Jung Yoon4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Graves vs Kathleen Chambers6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJessica Abels / Kimberly Lewis vs Jessica Chancellor / Gina Costello4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGayle Tanner / Jennifer Mattos vs April Larson / Michelle Agnew7-5, 6-2
2026-03-08vs JOHNSON RANCH 40AW4.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesChristie Cooley / Kimberly Becker vs Sasha MacKtinger / Kris Law6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGayle Tanner / Katie Graves vs Julie Rowland / Melissa Cella4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Mattos / Karla Barnette vs Marleen Ten Brink / Heather Orr0-1
2026-03-01vs GOLD RIVER RC 40AW4.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesHolly Tappan / Kimberly Becker vs Angela Lewis / Milla Austin6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlissa Watts / Jessica Abels vs So Jung Yoon / Kirstin Kolpitcke6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGayle Tanner / Katie Graves vs Michelle Agnew / Denise Daniel6-2, 6-3
2026-02-21vs JOHNSON RANCH 40AW4.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristie Cooley / Kimberly Becker vs Sasha MacKtinger / Kris Law1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlissa Watts / Fritzie Dorais vs Marleen Ten Brink / Molly Phillips2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGayle Tanner / Jessica Abels vs Stephanie Johnson / Heather Cowan3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-21vs JOHNSON RANCH 40AW4.5ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesChristie Cooley / Kimberly Becker vs Molly Phillips / Julie Rowland4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Graves vs Brigitte Mayo3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Lewis / Jessica Abels vs Marleen Ten Brink / Heather Cowan6-7
L#3 DoublesFritzie Dorais / Alissa Watts vs Melissa Cole / Christine Tennant2-6, 0-6
2026-02-08vs GOLD RIVER RC 40AW4.5AWon 31
W#1 DoublesHolly Tappan / Kimberly Lewis vs Maria Richardson / Jessica Chancellor6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesGayle Tanner vs Xuan Li3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlissa Watts / Fritzie Dorais vs Kirstin Kolpitcke / So Jung Yoon1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristie Cooley / Jessica Abels vs Ye Chen / Angela Lewis1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-07vs GOLD RIVER RC 40AW4.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesHolly Tappan / Christie Cooley vs Denise Daniel / Gina Costello6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Becker / Jessica Abels vs So Jung Yoon / Teri Ostling2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlissa Watts / Fritzie Dorais vs McKenzie Helvick / Ye Chen2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-31vs JOHNSON RANCH 40AW4.5ALost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberly Becker / Christie Cooley vs Heather Cowan / Molly Phillips4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGayle Tanner vs Brigitte Mayo6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFritzie Dorais / Alissa Watts vs Melissa Cella / Kris Law6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTinyee Chang / Kimberly Lewis vs Suzie MacIel / Marleen Ten Brink2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-01-18vs GOLD RIVER RC 40AW4.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesTinyee Chang / Holly Tappan vs Kirstin Kolpitcke / Gina Costello6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlissa Watts / Fritzie Dorais vs Kathleen Chambers / April Larson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKimberly Becker / Jessica Abels vs Michelle Agnew / Xuan Li7-5, 6-3
2026-01-10vs JOHNSON RANCH 40AW4.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesTinyee Chang / Karla Barnette vs Claudya Lum / Christine Tennant1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Becker / Jessica Abels vs Marleen Ten Brink / Stephanie Johnson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFritzie Dorais / Alissa Watts vs Melissa Cole / Julie Rowland4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings32 teams · Women's 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 40AW4.5A0723514162
2BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 40AW4.5A0791944297
3FIG GARDEN 40AW4.5A0752348309
4SUNNYVALE MTC 40AW4.5A08171534273
5SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40AW4.5B0892348317
6CARMEL V RANCH 40AW4.5A09251126261
7SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40AW4.5C0929727294
8BERKELEY TC 40AW4.5A09142249362
9RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40AW4.5A09132351338
10GILROY TENNIS CLUB/GILROY TENNIS CTR 40AW4.5A0982859386
11FOOTHILL COLL 40AW4.5A010291125260
12MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 40AW4.5A010291126287
13MILLS COLLEGE 40AW4.5A010271330305
14JOHNSON RANCH 40AW4.5A010281231300
15BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AW4.5A010271332291
16TIBURON PEN C 40AW4.5A010281233337
17WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW4.5A010261433320
18ST MARY 40AW4.5A010271334331
19IMPERIAL TC 40AW4.5A010231739329
20CLAREMONT R and S 40AW4.5A010221841335
21BROADSTONE RC 40AW4.5A010261441349
22RAFAEL RC 40AW4.5A010221845350
23BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW4.5A010221846372
24PETALUMA TA/LEGHORNS PK 40AW4.5A010182247356
25VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 40AW4.5A010182248378
26LOS GATOS SR 40AW4.5A010182252394
27SHARON HTS CC 40AW4.5A010162454382
28BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AW4.5B010132760409
29HARBOR PT 40AW4.5A010122863431
30WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AW4.5B01093167446
31GOLD RIVER RC 40AW4.5A01063468429
32MENLO ATHERTON HS 40AW4.5A01063470461

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Holly Tappan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Tinyee Chang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.26
Christie Cooley
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.18
Fritzie Dorais
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
4.13
Kimberly Becker
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.08
Jessica Abels
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
4.05
Alissa Watts
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.78
Gayle Tanner
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.76
Jennifer Mattos
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.71
Karla Barnette
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Lanie Steers
published
3.34
Katie Graves
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jill A Thompson
published
Yuri Hirakawa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Abels + Kimberly Becker3346% games−4.7% vs expected
Fritzie Dorais + Alissa Watts7743% games−9.1% vs expected
Christie Cooley + Kimberly Becker314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Tappan
40W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.54
Tinyee Chang
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Christie Cooley
23W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
Fritzie Dorais
17W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Kimberly Becker
23W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
Jessica Abels
13W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.08
4.5
Alissa Watts
9W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
Gayle Tanner
25W–17L career · 13 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Jennifer Mattos
17W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.76
Karla Barnette
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.71
Lanie Steers
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
Katie Graves
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
3.34
Jill A Thompson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Yuri Hirakawa
2W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.