Teams

SHARON HTS CC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-30vs MITCHELL PK CW7.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurel Dawson / Lauren Denenberg vs Yue Xu / Elaine Zhao1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Chai / Joanne Lofthouse vs Kathy Fan / Qi Zhou2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMaria Vegas / Carole Donnelly vs Esther Chen / Charlotte He5-7, 6-7
2025-10-28vs PENINSULA GCC CW7.5ALost 02
L#1 DoublesClaire Toffey / Mari Fowler vs Soraya Oliven / Katie St Geme3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Toledo / Sharon Yee vs Amy Fenton / Jen Keane3-6, 6-7
2025-10-25vs FREMONT HILLS CC CW7.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Green / Anna-liza Estoesta vs Stacy Reitmeir / Paula Guslani2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMaria Vegas / Kathy Kau vs Emily Ling / Rebecca Gyr7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Skarakis / Julie Mandia vs Lorelei Russell / Nina Ye6-3, 6-0
2025-10-23vs FREMONT HILLS CC CW7.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaria Vegas / Karen Toledo vs Jennifer Smith / Buffy Poon6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Green / Anna-liza Estoesta vs Lorelei Russell / Claudia Hevel6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDarcy A Richardes / Sarah Chai vs Terri Goldman / Claiborne Brown6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Vegas / Riyalyne Kim Zabat vs Paula Mangin / Kristen Steck6-3, 6-4
2025-09-28vs MITCHELL PK CW7.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Jones / Komal Goel vs Dejia Tang / Yue Xu1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesValorie Friedsam / Sarah Chai vs Asako Miyahara / Cindy Hyeok Kim4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLisa Sweeney / Carole Donnelly vs Jingwen Yu / Yingfei Wu7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Christina Bird
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Kristen Good
published
3.68
Valorie Friedsam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Claire Toffey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Jennifer Skarakis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Sally Fong
published
3.56
Darcy A Richardes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Maria Vegas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.49
Lauren Denenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Karen Toledo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Patricia Buck
published
3.31
Carole Donnelly
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Sarah Chai
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Anna-liza Estoesta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Sweeney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Julie Mandia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Kathy Kau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Komal Goel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joanne Lofthouse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Laurel Dawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Vegas + Karen Toledo303 matchesnot enough data
Carole Donnelly + Sarah Chai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Bird
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Kristen Good
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Valorie Friedsam
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Claire Toffey
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Jennifer Skarakis
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
Sally Fong
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Darcy A Richardes
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Maria Vegas
27W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Lauren Denenberg
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Karen Toledo
32W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Patricia Buck
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Carole Donnelly
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Sarah Chai
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Anna-liza Estoesta
12W–20L career · type S · 8 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Lisa Sweeney
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Julie Mandia
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
Kathy Kau
5W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Komal Goel
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Joanne Lofthouse
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laurel Dawson
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.