Teams

FREMONT HILLS CC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-25vs SHARON HTS CC CW7.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacy Reitmeir / Paula Guslani vs Heather Green / Anna-liza Estoesta6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEmily Ling / Rebecca Gyr vs Maria Vegas / Kathy Kau6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLorelei Russell / Nina Ye vs Jennifer Skarakis / Julie Mandia3-6, 0-6
2025-10-23vs SHARON HTS CC CW7.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Smith / Buffy Poon vs Maria Vegas / Karen Toledo7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLorelei Russell / Claudia Hevel vs Heather Green / Anna-liza Estoesta1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTerri Goldman / Claiborne Brown vs Darcy A Richardes / Sarah Chai7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Rhonda Bucklin
published
3.90
Tracy Roeder
published
3.89
Michele Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Emily Ling
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.84
Cori Mehring
published 4
3.83
Stacy Reitmeir
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Torch Tan
published
3.54
Veronique Miro
published
3.52
Claiborne Brown
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.42
Lorelei Russell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Paula Guslani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Rebecca Gyr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Buffy Poon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Cheryl Mathews
published 3.5
3.22
Adrienne Lee
published 3.5
3.16
Pookie Kochatchawan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Melina Carey
published
3.07
Nina Ye
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.05
Clari Nolet
published 3.5
2.97
Claudia Hevel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ilene Silver
published
Laura Gwosden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronique Miro + Stacy Reitmeir7948% games+0.4% vs expected
Paula Guslani + Claiborne Brown3252% gamesnot enough data
Pookie Kochatchawan + Claiborne Brown224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rhonda Bucklin
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Tracy Roeder
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.90
Michele Brown
20W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
Emily Ling
42W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Cori Mehring
18W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
Stacy Reitmeir
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Torch Tan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Veronique Miro
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Claiborne Brown
50W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Lorelei Russell
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Paula Guslani
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Rebecca Gyr
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Buffy Poon
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cheryl Mathews
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Adrienne Lee
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Pookie Kochatchawan
21W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Melina Carey
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Nina Ye
8W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Clari Nolet
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Claudia Hevel
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Ilene Silver
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Gwosden
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.