Teams

Schwartz (Coral Oaks)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.92 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-07vs Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Bamford / Stephanie Voell vs Maria Carolina Perera / IRMA CAMARENA7-5, 6-0
2025-02-28vs Chamizo (Dante Fascell)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Bamford / Stephanie Voell vs Sherien Elbahkeiry / Beth Story6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLina Tower vs Laura Curi6-1, 6-3
2025-02-14vs City EaglesLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolina Concha / Lina Tower vs BRIDGET MURPHY / Evelyn Leahy0-6, 0-6
2025-01-24vs Miami/TeamForman/40&over 3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesSherrie Smyth / Stephanie Voell vs Andrea Tovar / Ellen Fine1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLina Tower vs Adriana Monsalve1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Stephanie Voell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Michele Saverin
published
Carolina Concha
published 3
2.72
Allison Reilly
published 3
2.63
Jackie Kearns
published
2.62
Claire Thuen
published 3
2.59
Lina Tower
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.54
Astrid Arditi
published 3
2.50
Zoe Leinoff
published
2.49
Marylynne Schwartz
published
2.46
Rolande Rose
published
2.40
Nadia Pazos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marylynne Schwartz + Allison Reilly2639% games+1.2% vs expected
Claire Thuen + Jackie Kearns4743% games−0.2% vs expected
Nadia Pazos + Astrid Arditi1837% games−3.3% vs expected
Zoe Leinoff + Rolande Rose0733% games−11.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Stephanie Voell
63W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Michele Saverin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Carolina Concha
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Allison Reilly
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Jackie Kearns
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Claire Thuen
4W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
2.5
Lina Tower
16W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
3
Astrid Arditi
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Zoe Leinoff
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Marylynne Schwartz
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Rolande Rose
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Nadia Pazos
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.