Teams

SFV - Dominators

2022 Adult 40 & Over - SFV · SFV 40 & Over - Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-31vs SFV - Northridge QuakesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMauricio Muller / Edmond Avedisian vs Daniel Iwata / Steve Oetomo1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-26vs SFV - Toluca LakersWon 10
W#2 DoublesBurke Franklin / David Berkowitz vs Benjamin Hayes / Bruce Upbin6-3, 7-5
2022-03-19Lost 02
L#1 SinglesBurke Franklin vs Olivier Demail1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Mauricio Muller vs David Elman / Jerry Shapiro6-7, 2-6
2022-03-13vs SFV - Rooftop BallersWon 20
W#1 SinglesBurke Franklin vs Jason Pivnik6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLee Tsai / RUBEN SIMON vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-06vs SFV LLW - The 300's - Aldo ArganaLost 01
L#2 DoublesBurke Franklin / David Berkowitz vs Gary Weinzimer / Shimon Nofar2-6, 0-6
2022-02-27vs SFV - Dance With The DevilWon 10
W#2 DoublesBurke Franklin / David Berkowitz vs Raymond Ascani / Patrick Novak6-3, 6-2
2022-01-30Lost 12
W#1 SinglesBurke Franklin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / David Berkowitz vs Benjamin Hurvitz / George Rodriguez2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRod Shimamoto / Lee Tsai vs Mark Glouner / Jeffrey Sadler4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 40 & Over - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Jared Mano
published
3.74
Timothy Chun
published
3.72
Won Cho
published
3.61
Edmond Avedisian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Burke Franklin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.31
Lee Tsai
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Rod Shimamoto
published
3.14
David Berkowitz
published 3.5
RUBEN SIMON
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Won Cho + Timothy Chun3260% games+4.0% vs expected
Jared Mano + Burke Franklin2350% gamesnot enough data
Jared Mano + Lee Tsai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Mano
91W–52L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.97
Timothy Chun
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Won Cho
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Edmond Avedisian
104W–117L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Burke Franklin
157W–97L career · 6 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Lee Tsai
212W–155L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Rod Shimamoto
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
David Berkowitz
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
RUBEN SIMON
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.