Teams

NRRC: Volley Llamas

2024 18&Over Women Day Fall · 4.0 Day

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-05vs TCH: Double TroubleWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaitlan Cantwell / Corey Cook vs Katherine Harcsar / Robin Good6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Dorfman / Lisa Sippel vs Faith Ackerman / Trista Neubauer3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Keefe / Jennifer Marsh vs Rita Lieberman / Mona Swanson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-14vs Rye Racquet BABSLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Abrams / Darcy Froehlich vs Melissa Edwards / Victoria Maggard6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesOlga Orgielewicz / Miran Robarts vs Christine Rizk / Wendy Hyer6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMargarita Barrera / Annie Berger vs Judith Leake / Lori Talucci0-6, 3-6
2023-11-07vs Sportime Harbor IslandLost 03
L#1 DoublesOlga Orgielewicz / Miran Robarts vs Alison Brown / Allison Gibbs7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Strating / Kathryn Biggs vs Louise Barclay / Tori Brennan1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFrancine Pollack / Jennifer Keefe vs Joy Sexton / Julianne Feder7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-11-02vs Sportime LI: PhoenixWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Biggs / Inga Dawe vs Shoko Okado / Lindsay Martin7-5, 5-6
W#2 DoublesLori Abrams / Darcy Froehlich vs Chase Haynes English / Julie Berardelli2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoan Hiam / Annie Berger vs Leah Rapoport / Amy Suehnholz7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-26vs Sportime Harbor IslandWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaitlan Cantwell / Corey Cook vs Allison Gibbs / Julianne Feder3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Dorfman / Olga Orgielewicz vs Jennifer Naso / Tori Brennan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnnie Berger / Margarita Barrera vs Linda Solomon / Anne Bensel6-4, 6-1
2023-10-13vs Rye Racquet BABSWon 21
W#1 DoublesInga Dawe / Olga Orgielewicz vs Melissa Edwards / Wendy Hyer5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Dorfman / Lori Abrams vs Polly Edwards / Andrea Hessekiel6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMiran Robarts / Joan Hiam vs Christy Schultze / Jelena Spyropoulos3-6, 0-6
2023-10-06vs MTDZ: Match MakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Abrams / Kathryn Biggs vs Jennifer Chan / Sharon Ho3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Dorfman / Nora Holmes vs Cinthia Griot / Cintia Shiro1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Marsh / Jennifer Keefe vs Tamie Maehara / Ayako Tsukamoto6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-12vs Tennis Club of HastingsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDarcy Froehlich / Carolyn Dorfman vs Laura Chilton / Leah McVey3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMiran Robarts / Kathryn Biggs vs Laura Zarba / Mariela Melamed6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Marsh / Annie Berger vs Scottie Guerney / Kimberly Kraus6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 4.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Grand Slam: Spinderellas0819416186
2Sportime Lake Isle: Aceholes0815722227
3MTDZ: Match Makers0815823209
4TIA 4.008121123191
5Rye Racquet BABS08121123196
6Tennis Club of Hastings08131124197
7NRRC: Volley Llamas08131027234
8Saw Mill Smash Sisters0891328206
9Armonk Indoor: Kick Aces08101329220
10Life Time Pearl08101230227
11TCH: Double Trouble08101331231
12Armonk Tennis Club: Frank0881332223
13Sportime LI: Phoenix0881435254
14Club Fit Briarcliff0832042259

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Homan
published 5
3.99
Kaitlan Cantwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Inga Dawe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Corey Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Rachel Abrams
published
Carolyn Dorfman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
Jennifer Marsh
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.68
Lisa Sippel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Kathryn Biggs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Annie Berger
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.58
Darcy Froehlich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Lori Abrams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Miran Robarts
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Karen Strating
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Nora Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Jennifer Keefe
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.46
Olga Orgielewicz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.43
Francine Pollack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Margarita Barrera
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Joan Hiam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Katherine Moon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Marsh + Annie Berger23563% games+7.8% vs expected
Corey Cook + Kaitlan Cantwell6360% games+6.5% vs expected
Jennifer Keefe + Jennifer Marsh11654% games+5.6% vs expected
Margarita Barrera + Annie Berger4453% games+5.5% vs expected
Olga Orgielewicz + Annie Berger3353% games+2.4% vs expected
Francine Pollack + Jennifer Marsh24758% games+1.5% vs expected
Lori Abrams + Carolyn Dorfman2345% games+1.3% vs expected
Jennifer Keefe + Annie Berger16953% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Adam Homan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kaitlan Cantwell
23W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
Inga Dawe
30W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Corey Cook
55W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Rachel Abrams
31W–25L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Carolyn Dorfman
16W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jennifer Marsh
195W–126L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Lisa Sippel
71W–57L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Kathryn Biggs
76W–92L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Annie Berger
145W–77L career · 7 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Darcy Froehlich
132W–100L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Lori Abrams
88W–91L career · 4 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.57
Miran Robarts
80W–103L career · 4 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Karen Strating
106W–60L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
4
Nora Holmes
181W–161L career · 1 line in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
Jennifer Keefe
185W–109L career · 8 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
Olga Orgielewicz
33W–43L career · 5 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Francine Pollack
126W–81L career · 2 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.43
Margarita Barrera
100W–92L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Joan Hiam
39W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Katherine Moon
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.