Teams

TIA 4.0

2024 18&Over Women Day Fall · 4.0 Day

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-05vs Club Fit BriarcliffWon 30
W#1 DoublesGillian Pinchin / Emily Arnone vs Stephanie Calman / Nurit Praeger6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSophie Porcelli / Michele Halem vs Lorraine Campo / Christine Moore6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoanie Terraciano / Sally Connolly vs Jennifer Sheehy / Rachel Bennett6-3, 6-3
2023-11-28vs Armonk Tennis Club: FrankLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Kienzle / Berry Ravitz vs Melissa Berardis / Phyllis WAN-HUEN3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Reynolds / Satoko Tanimoto vs Susan Heilbrunn / Patti Trainor-Wrazej2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Halem / Sophie Porcelli vs Pamela Fuehrer / Susanna Nichols6-3, 6-2
2023-11-09vs Saw Mill Smash SistersWon 21
W#1 DoublesSejal Vora / Kimberly Many vs Natasha Sauerborn / Ellen Finn6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSally Connolly / Joanie Terraciano vs Gabrielle Zilkha / Randi Siegel6-7, 4-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Raab / Berry Ravitz vs Misun Kim / Tamara Krstic6-4, 4-6
2023-10-26vs Life Time PearlWon 30
W#1 DoublesDawn Hone / Veronica Coach vs Wenchun Wu / Christine Titone6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Halem / Sophie Porcelli vs Brenda Gordon / Lisa Lescroart6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSatoko Tanimoto / Sally Connolly vs Emily Levine / Robin Frankel6-2, 6-4
2023-10-19vs Armonk Indoor: Kick AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesGillian Pinchin / Emily Arnone vs Roge Nesbitt / Victoria Madonna5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSatoko Tanimoto / Veronica Coach vs Rachel Milim / Danielle Orellana4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Hone / Margaret Kienzle vs Shuofei Gao / Maria Das Neves6-4, 6-2
2023-10-12vs Grand Slam: SpinderellasLost 03
L#1 DoublesCristina Casati-Lewis / Pilar Estrada vs Whitney Maurer / Kelly Thomas3-6, 2-4
L#2 DoublesSejal Vora / Kimberly Many vs Jane Kim / Kate Jennings6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Hone / Margaret Kienzle vs Alessandra Veronesi / Debbie Cannavino4-6, 5-5
2023-10-05vs Sportime Lake Isle: AceholesWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Many / Sejal Vora vs Kathryn Hommel / Jessica Pearson6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMonique Bluhm / Kristen Woll vs Paola Michel / Carolyne Rainero4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Reynolds / Satoko Tanimoto vs Michelle Dvorkin / Wendy Foster6-0, 6-3
2023-09-21vs Greenwich Racquet ClubLost 12
L#1 DoublesDawn Hone / Veronica Coach vs Sylvie Roisin / Jane Hentemann6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMonique Bluhm / Berry Ravitz vs Natasha Kloster / Kim Athan4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesEmily Arnone / Gillian Pinchin vs Keri Cameron / Meghan Keane6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 4.0 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Grand Slam: Spinderellas0819416186
2Sportime Lake Isle: Aceholes0815722227
3MTDZ: Match Makers0815823209
4TIA 4.008121123191
5Rye Racquet BABS08121123196
6Tennis Club of Hastings08131124197
7NRRC: Volley Llamas08131027234
8Saw Mill Smash Sisters0891328206
9Armonk Indoor: Kick Aces08101329220
10Life Time Pearl08101230227
11TCH: Double Trouble08101331231
12Armonk Tennis Club: Frank0881332223
13Sportime LI: Phoenix0881435254
14Club Fit Briarcliff0832042259

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Sejal Vora
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Veronica Coach
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Pilar Estrada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Satoko Tanimoto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Gillian Pinchin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Cristina Casati-Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.70
Emily Arnone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Joanie Terraciano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Dawn Hone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Kimberly Many
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Sophie Porcelli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Monique Bluhm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Michele Halem
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Sally Connolly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Kristen Woll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Berry Ravitz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Julie Raab
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Kienzle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Coach + Michele Halem7263% games+9.3% vs expected
Cristina Casati-Lewis + Pilar Estrada8456% games+7.2% vs expected
Dawn Hone + Kimberly Many7259% games+7.1% vs expected
Monique Bluhm + Sejal Vora6257% games+6.8% vs expected
Veronica Coach + Monique Bluhm9559% games+3.5% vs expected
Dawn Hone + Berry Ravitz271753% games+3.2% vs expected
Veronica Coach + Sejal Vora341258% games+3.1% vs expected
Veronica Coach + Kimberly Many7157% games+2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sejal Vora
143W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Veronica Coach
148W–72L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.89
Pilar Estrada
64W–41L career · 1 line in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Satoko Tanimoto
198W–129L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Gillian Pinchin
105W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Cristina Casati-Lewis
79W–99L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Emily Arnone
131W–107L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Joanie Terraciano
53W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Dawn Hone
224W–150L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Kimberly Many
87W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
Sophie Porcelli
122W–85L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Monique Bluhm
71W–70L career · 2 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Michele Halem
51W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Sally Connolly
52W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kristen Woll
48W–55L career · 1 line in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Berry Ravitz
175W–103L career · 3 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.45
Julie Raab
39W–42L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Kienzle
90W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.