Teams

FCCC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 4.06 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-27vs CSU GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesPatti Helper / April Walden vs Jill Hartman / Priscilla Dressen6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Repert vs Barbara Jewell6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMeredith Lorick vs Cathy Graves7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynette Krueger / Dierdre Sadeh vs Peggy Johnson / Taylor Montey6-4, 6-1
2024-05-20vs HMTC TEALWon 31
W#1 DoublesApril Walden / Patti Helper vs Debra Netzel / Melissa Myers5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda Repert vs Ava Zink6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDierdre Sadeh / Lynette Krueger vs Mischel Ebon Libunao / Erin Livingstone3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMeredith Lorick vs Miyuki Chovanetz6-4, 6-2
2024-05-13vs MLF PURPLEWon 32
W#1 DoublesAmanda Repert / Patti Helper vs Sarah Soffe / Annette Vizena6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNancy Kepner vs Erica Bernhardt2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLynette Krueger / Dierdre Sadeh vs Becky Rosetti-Solley / Jaime Donnelly6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMeredith Lorick vs Isabela Lorey6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Anderson / Robin Bachelet vs Rachel Levalley / Emily Jones6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-06vs LVTA NAVYWon 50
W#1 DoublesApril Walden / Amanda Repert vs Helen Crews / Trish Lebsack6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMeredith Lorick vs CYNDI ROTHMAN6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLynette Krueger / Dierdre Sadeh vs Mary Wilson / Vicki Davis6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNancy Kepner vs Lusan DellaGrotte6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynn Clay / Patti Helper vs Shelli Friesen / Jennifer Schafer6-3, 6-0
2024-04-29vs CSU GOLDWon 32
L#1 DoublesDierdre Sadeh / Lynette Krueger vs Christine Pelletier / Hanna Grow-Morales4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Repert vs Meredith McClellan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesApril Walden / Patti Helper vs Christine Houldsworth / Christina Welch6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMeredith Lorick vs Megan Mattix6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Anderson / Robin Bachelet vs Tonya Motley / Debra Lukasiewicz6-2, 6-1
2024-04-22vs MLF ORANGEWon 32
L#1 DoublesApril Walden / Patti Helper vs Nancy Olsen / Amy Ritchie6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda Repert vs Jenae Curley6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLynette Krueger / Dierdre Sadeh vs Joy Miller / Sybil Sharvelle6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMeredith Lorick vs Bethany Seely7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJen Guernsey / Robin Bachelet vs Melissa Seager / Valerie Hecker5-7, 4-6
2024-04-15vs CSU WHITEWon 40
W#1 DoublesAmy Anderson / April Walden vs Rachel Robertson / Rachel Fernandez-Grant6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAmanda Repert vs Sara Fedel6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLynette Krueger / Dierdre Sadeh vs Erin Pasold / Anja Mau6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNancy Kepner vs Edie LaFonte6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Amanda Repert
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.00
Meredith Lorick
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.88
April Walden
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.73
Patti Helper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.68
Dierdre Sadeh
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.67
Hailey Swanbom
published 4
3.60
Robin Bachelet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Jen Guernsey
published
3.57
Nancy Kepner
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.50
Lynn Clay
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patti Helper + Amanda Repert10555% games+3.4% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + Robin Bachelet2547% games+1.0% vs expected
Patti Helper + April Walden331157% games+1.0% vs expected
Patti Helper + Robin Bachelet2442% games−2.2% vs expected
April Walden + Amanda Repert10558% games−2.7% vs expected
Patti Helper + Dierdre Sadeh5355% games−8.6% vs expected
Dierdre Sadeh + April Walden81248% games−13.1% vs expected
Amanda Repert + Robin Bachelet3448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amanda Repert
75W–56L career · 7 lines in 2024
34%65%<1%
4.06
4
Meredith Lorick
101W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
April Walden
102W–76L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Patti Helper
70W–45L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Dierdre Sadeh
67W–85L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Hailey Swanbom
23W–23L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Robin Bachelet
56W–98L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Jen Guernsey
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Nancy Kepner
20W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Lynn Clay
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.