Teams

MLF ORANGE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-27vs LVTA NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Cathy Thomas vs Shelli Friesen / Renee Davis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Thomas / Nancy Olsen vs Vicki Davis / Mary Wilson6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBethany Seely vs Lusan DellaGrotte6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenae Curley / Sybil Sharvelle vs Carol Propst / Linda Miller3-6, 5-7
2024-05-20vs CSU GOLDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCathy Thomas / Melissa Seager vs Meredith McClellan / Christina Welch6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSybil Sharvelle vs Alison Earnhart1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Thomas / Joy Miller vs Christine Houldsworth / Eileen Heath6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Olsen / Lorena Laffitte vs Laurel McClellan / Debra Lukasiewicz6-3, 6-1
2024-05-13vs CSU WHITEWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelissa Seager / Sybil Sharvelle vs Erin Pasold / Cynthia McGrorey6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCathy Thomas vs Rachel Robertson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBethany Seely / Joy Miller vs Carolyn Guernsey / Ruth Callahan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesWendy Thomas / Valerie Hecker vs Anja Mau / Sara Fedel6-1, 6-2
2024-05-10vs HMTC TEALWon 41
L#1 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Wendy Thomas vs Debra Netzel / Melissa Myers6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJenae Curley vs Rebecca Tatman6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Seager / Sybil Sharvelle vs Susan Holland / Mischel Ebon Libunao6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesBethany Seely vs Miyuki Chovanetz6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoy Miller / Nancy Olsen vs LeAnne Collins / Kelley Hoime4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-29vs MLF PURPLESplit 22
L#1 DoublesBethany Seely / Melissa Seager vs Carrie Galyardt / Annette Vizena6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJenae Curley vs Erica Bernhardt4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Olsen / Joy Miller vs KELLY KHAN / Rachel Levalley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Thomas / Sybil Sharvelle vs Susan Starr Nelson / Jaime Donnelly6-2, 6-4
2024-04-22vs FCCC REDLost 23
W#1 DoublesNancy Olsen / Amy Ritchie vs April Walden / Patti Helper6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJenae Curley vs Amanda Repert0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoy Miller / Sybil Sharvelle vs Lynette Krueger / Dierdre Sadeh1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesBethany Seely vs Meredith Lorick5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Seager / Valerie Hecker vs Jen Guernsey / Robin Bachelet7-5, 6-4
2024-04-15vs CSU GREENWon 41
W#1 DoublesCathy Thomas / Melissa Seager vs Priscilla Dressen / Peggy Johnson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLorena Laffitte vs Cathy Graves6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBethany Seely / Amy Ritchie vs Dina Rank / Barbara Jewell2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJenae Curley vs Katie Barstow3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoy Miller / Sybil Sharvelle vs Wendy Schaffer / Julie Walker6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Cathy Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.88
Wendy Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Amy Ritchie
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Bethany Seely
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Lorena Laffitte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.74
Melissa Seager
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.72
Jenae Curley
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.64
Joy Miller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Valerie Hecker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Sybil Sharvelle
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Miller + Bethany Seely7169% games+13.9% vs expected
Valerie Hecker + Amy Ritchie4254% games+8.3% vs expected
Amy Ritchie + Wendy Thomas13956% games+4.2% vs expected
Melissa Seager + Bethany Seely3455% games−0.1% vs expected
Joy Miller + Melissa Seager2449% games−10.2% vs expected
Valerie Hecker + Wendy Thomas314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Ritchie + Bethany Seely303 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Thomas + Joy Miller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Thomas
39W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.97
Wendy Thomas
43W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Amy Ritchie
43W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Bethany Seely
76W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
Lorena Laffitte
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Melissa Seager
40W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Jenae Curley
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Joy Miller
33W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Valerie Hecker
77W–115L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Sybil Sharvelle
18W–12L career · 7 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.