Teams

CHIP-Bausewein 18s 5.0X/Co-ed

5.0 SUMMER MIXED DOUBLES · 2026 5.0X

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-31Won 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesJohn Black / Lynae Darbes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesLani Bausewein / Brittany Pendergraft vs Gary Tono / Kathryn Mazurek6-0, 6-2
2026-07-24vs LIB-DAWSON 18s 5.0X/Co-edWon 10
W#2 Mixed DoublesLynae Darbes / Paul Echeverria vs Sarah Rimar / Kalen Rimar6-4, 6-1
2026-06-26vs LIB-DAWSON 18s 5.0X/Co-edWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarco Coderoni / Lynae Darbes vs Naomi Goldberg / Norca Roche7-5, 6-1
2026-06-19vs DEER-Cousins 18s 5.0X/Co-edWon 10
W#2 Mixed DoublesLani Bausewein / Sang Won Choi vs Reba Issac / Gary Tono6-2, 6-4
2026-06-12vs HAWK-LOWENTHAL 18s 5.0X/Co-edLost 01
L#2 Mixed DoublesLani Bausewein / Sang Won Choi vs Brenda Cortes / Quinn Culbertson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-05vs LIB-DAWSON 18s 5.0X/Co-edLost 01
L#1 Mixed DoublesLani Bausewein / John Black vs Sean Robenalt / Lindsey Shedd3-6, 4-6
2026-05-29vs DEER-Cousins 18s 5.0X/Co-edLost 01
L#1 Mixed DoublesLynae Darbes / Evgenii Fetisov vs Heather Peaden / Nicholas Williams2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2026 5.0X
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LIB-DAWSON 18s 5.0X/Co-ed63151225212
2HAWK-LOWENTHAL 18s 5.0X/Co-ed63151229223
3CHIP-Bausewein 18s 5.0X/Co-ed54151224188
4DEER-Cousins 18s 5.0X/Co-ed1891839260

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
2.48
Sophia Ford
published
2.46
Jing Bai
published
2.44
Wayne Lowmaster
published
2.39
Kelly Demske
published
2.36
Lani Bausewein
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 50%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.30
2.16
Lynae Darbes
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Paul Echeverria
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Wasserman Smith
10W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
Sophia Ford
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
Jing Bai
33W–35L career · no lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.46
Wayne Lowmaster
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Kelly Demske
21W–16L career · no lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
2.5
Lani Bausewein
40W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Brittany Pendergraft
12W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Lynae Darbes
29W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Paul Echeverria
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.