Teams

KF.Daniel

2025 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-04vs CAS.PedersenWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephane Daniel / Scott Hoffman vs Marc Kaufman / Glenn Lycan7-5, 6-3
2025-04-30vs LOCH.NewsomeWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephane Daniel / Jim Smith vs Christopher Wooten / Bert Clancey6-2, 6-1
2025-04-13vs CAS.PedersenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephane Daniel / John Latzy vs Taylor VICK / Robert Johnson6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Ferris / Ron Jeffery vs J Wright / Ivan Lacross3-6, 6-7
2025-03-23vs CAS.PedersenLost 02
L#2 DoublesStephane Daniel / Peter Hornbach vs J Wright / Robert Johnson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKip Sturgis / Kevin Fitzcharles vs Glenn Lycan / Morten Pedersen3-6, 5-7
2025-03-09vs LOCH.NewsomeLost 01
L#3 DoublesRon Jeffery / John Jabusch vs Bert Clancey / Christopher Wooten2-6, 2-6
2025-03-02vs CAS.PedersenSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKip Sturgis / Stephane Daniel vs Marc Kaufman / Morten Pedersen1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Hornbach / Kevin Fitzcharles vs Glenn Lycan / Ivan Lacross6-1, 6-2
2025-02-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesRon Jeffery / John Jabusch vs Daniel McDonald / David Werk6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
John Latzy
published
3.52
Kevin Fitzcharles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
David Ferris
published 3.5
3.44
Stephane Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
David Sardinha
published 3.5
3.23
Stan Lucas
published
3.21
Ron Jeffery
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Peter Hornbach
published
3.17
John Jabusch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kip Sturgis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ron Jeffery + John Jabusch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Latzy
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
3.5
Kevin Fitzcharles
92W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.52
3.5
David Ferris
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Stephane Daniel
63W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
David Sardinha
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stan Lucas
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Ron Jeffery
37W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Peter Hornbach
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
John Jabusch
7W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Kip Sturgis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.