Teams

Sports Mall-Torres

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W PM

15 players · average NTRP 3.55 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-28vs Liberty Park-ByingtonLost 02
L#2 DoublesJamie DeLong / Emily Fuller vs Kendall Armstrong / Sam Steiner7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKate Franko / Lora Lyon vs Nicole Leatham / Mary Snow3-6, 6-7
2025-05-21vs Liberty Park-Leikin/SpencerWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicole Huston / Jamie DeLong vs Madelyn Totland / Gabriella Romney6-1, 7-5
2025-05-14Split 11
L#2 SinglesKate Franko vs Alivia Winkel4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLora Lyon / Jamie DeLong vs Hayley Pfister / Heidi Chytraus6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-07vs Sports Mall-Peterson/FarrSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKassie Torres / Jamie DeLong vs Naomi Stroud-Peterson / Brynn Hardman6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesKate Franko vs Annie Mortensen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicole Huston / Elaine Day vs Carla Stoddard / Sharon Larkin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-23vs Antczak Park-Bayna/GonzalezLost 01
L#2 DoublesNicole Huston / Jamie DeLong vs Natalie Romaniw / Stacia Carroll0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesJamie DeLong / Angela Jensen vs Allison Leishman / Alisa Kesler6-3, 6-3
2025-04-16vs Cottonwood Club-Kieffer/HaverkostLost 02
L#2 DoublesKassie Torres / Nicole Huston vs Beata Kieffer / Genin Harkey4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesKate Franko vs Mary Diaz Gordon2-6, 2-6
2025-04-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesKassie Torres / Jamie DeLong vs Yoko Walljasper / Julie Labrum6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Rachel Mcillece
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4
3.73
Alexa Saltzman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 4
3.62
Yuliya Kozyreva
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 19% · published 4
3.52
Kassie Torres
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Catherine van Uitert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Bessy Nielson
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 3.5
3.27
Lora Lyon
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Emily Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Jamie DeLong
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Jessica Whittaker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.95
Lori Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.68
Kate Franko
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Elaine Day
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.63
Angela Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Nicole Huston
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Mcillece + Yuliya Kozyreva8162% games+8.6% vs expected
Jamie DeLong + Nicole Huston15564% games+7.3% vs expected
Kassie Torres + Jamie DeLong121053% games+6.7% vs expected
Elaine Day + Kassie Torres4252% games+2.6% vs expected
Elaine Day + Catherine van Uitert2544% games−1.4% vs expected
Jamie DeLong + Alexa Saltzman4457% games−2.9% vs expected
Angela Jensen + Lora Lyon5547% games−4.3% vs expected
Elaine Day + Lori Wilson11038% games−7.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rachel Mcillece
105W–44L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Alexa Saltzman
126W–65L career · 17 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Yuliya Kozyreva
84W–28L career · 16 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Kassie Torres
180W–119L career · 12 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Catherine van Uitert
50W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Bessy Nielson
213W–160L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Lora Lyon
102W–83L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Emily Fuller
29W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jamie DeLong
171W–129L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Jessica Whittaker
87W–79L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Lori Wilson
71W–153L career · 7 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Kate Franko
50W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Elaine Day
124W–248L career · 15 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Angela Jensen
98W–97L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
Nicole Huston
37W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.