Teams

Hills/Armagost

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Men · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-04vs TYCC - J. FeeneyWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrad Armagost / Mark Wolfson vs John Feeney / James Baker6-2, 6-4
2021-11-20vs Hunters Green Bucks - M. BittingLost 01
L#2 DoublesThor Moody / Craig Feldmeier vs Erik Hajek / John Slatniske6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2021-10-30vs Saddlebrook - L. BarbettaLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlex Blair / Thor Moody vs Good Oh / Justin Li4-6, 6-7
2021-10-23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesThor Moody / Mark Wolfson vs Barry Cohen / Donald Bell6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2021-10-16vs Cheval Kings - J. KniermanWon 10
W#3 DoublesAlex Blair / Thor Moody vs Roger Bensinger / Sundar Srinivasan6-3, 6-2
2021-10-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesThor Moody / Ernie Pabon vs Paul Williams / Jakob Andersen5-7, 3-6
2021-09-25vs Palma Ceia - J. EckermannWon 10
W#3 DoublesThor Moody / Alex Blair vs Robert Cimino / Todd Lax6-0, 6-3
2021-09-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesMark Wolfson / Matt Denaro vs David Park / Andrew Newman6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hugo Rodriguez
published 4.5
3.88
Ernie Pabon
published 4
3.80
Eugene Holliday
published 4
3.76
Lance Hill
published
Brad Armagost
published 4
3.72
Thor Moody
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Wolfson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Sterns
published
Stephen Mullis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Wolfson + Thor Moody123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hugo Rodriguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ernie Pabon
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Eugene Holliday
7W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Lance Hill
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Brad Armagost
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thor Moody
148W–97L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Mark Wolfson
62W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Miguel Angel Goni Rodrigo
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Randy Sterns
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Mullis
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.