Teams

NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: Webster

NIN FW Mixed 18 & Over · NIN FW MXD 18&0 9.0

4 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-15vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: EgglestonWon 20
W#2 DoublesJon Metz / Linying Xiao vs Andres Cobos / Sarah Hoffacker4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Seale / Alaina Roberts vs Joshua Rifkin / Tori Schwartz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-09vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: EgglestonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyan Seale / Alaina Roberts vs Gonzalo Vivas Ortega / Julie Willmert2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJon Metz / Taelor Grose vs Andres Cobos / Sarah Hoffacker2-6, 6-7
2026-04-19vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: EgglestonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJon Metz / Taelor Grose vs Ethan Radke / Megan Wilson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEric Webster / Linying Xiao vs Tim Stauffer / Leah Barnes1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-12vs NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: EgglestonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEric Webster / Melissa Cleveland vs Ethan Radke / Megan Wilson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRyan Seale / Taelor Grose vs Ben Eggleston / Julie Willmert6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NIN FW MXD 18&0 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: Webster326924174
2NIN FW MXD 18&O 9.0: Eggleston239614121

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Jon Metz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Taelor Grose
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Ryan Seale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Eric Webster
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Metz
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11
Taelor Grose
93W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.84
Ryan Seale
136W–53L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.60
Eric Webster
131W–59L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.