Teams

TOC.Thakkar

2022 CTRL Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesJessenia Delos Santos / Eduardo Delossantos vs Lindsay Wrege / Michael Evans6-0, 6-0
2022-07-16vs PW.HallWon 20
W#2 DoublesPaul Narula / Suzanne Miller vs Meghan Roy / Rich Roy6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLuo Xiao / Mahek Thakkar vs Meghan Arndts / Kris Case6-1, 6-0
2022-07-11vs TOC.TerjesenWon 20
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Miller / Paul Narula vs Sabrina Kane / Douglas Washabaugh6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeghan Rider / Luke Rider vs Cindy Bunce / Stephen Fu7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-09Won 20
W#1 DoublesLindsay Castret / Paul Narula vs Joyce Stevenson / Sudhakar Atturu6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMeghan Rider / Luke Rider vs Olga Ryzhikova / Mark Stevenson6-0, 6-4
2022-06-29vs TOC.StognerWon 20
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Miller / Paul Narula vs Katie Whitley / Ronald Stogner6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLuo Xiao / Jessenia Delos Santos vs Samantha Levine / Steve Levine6-3, 6-3
2022-06-10vs MD.RawlsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLindsay Castret / Paul Narula vs Todd Sninski / Dabney Sninski6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJessenia Delos Santos / Eduardo Delossantos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-04vs TOC.TempleWon 20
W#2 DoublesMeghan Rider / Luke Rider vs Sarah Butler / Geoffrey Monsees6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJessenia Delos Santos / Eduardo Delossantos vs Kerry Espinola / Neal Sugg6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Lindsay Castret
published
3.54
Meghan Rider
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Paul Narula
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Luo Xiao
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Eduardo Delossantos
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.91
Daniel Horowitz
published 3.5
2.85
Sud Ramasamy
published 3
2.84
Jay Thakkar
published
2.71
Wayne Xiao
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Castret
20W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.30
4
Meghan Rider
342W–169L career · 3 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Paul Narula
142W–108L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Luo Xiao
85W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Eduardo Delossantos
61W–76L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Daniel Horowitz
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Sud Ramasamy
84W–64L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Jay Thakkar
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.84
Jessenia Delos Santos
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Wayne Xiao
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.