Teams

TOC.Temple

2022 CTRL Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-30vs MD.RawlsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKerry Espinola / Neal Sugg vs Stephanie Wright / Matt Wright6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Hagopian-Edwards / Michael Carone vs Brooke Rawls / Bobby Rawls2-6, 1-6
2022-07-23vs LOCH.PeltLost 02
L#1 DoublesJamie Hinckley / Dan Hinckley vs Kristine Pelt / Kenneth Waters6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKerry Espinola / Neal Sugg vs Elizabeth Schwartz / Adam Schwartz1-6, 1-6
2022-07-16Split 11
L#2 DoublesJamie Hinckley / Dan Hinckley vs Catherine Moylan / Michael Evans7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Leynor / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Michael Piccola / Katelyn Pownall6-3, 6-3
2022-07-09vs PW.HallLost 01
L#1 DoublesJamie Hinckley / Dan Hinckley vs Kimberly Hall / Blake Hall0-6, 3-6
2022-06-18vs TOC.TerjesenLost 02
L#1 DoublesJamie Hinckley / Dan Hinckley vs Stephen Fu / Andrea Desonglo1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Leynor / Jessica Sahoo vs Douglas Washabaugh / LuAnn Eyerman3-6, 2-6
2022-06-11vs TOC.StognerWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeoffrey Monsees / Jessica Sahoo vs Ronald Stogner / Pamela Godwin2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-04vs TOC.ThakkarLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Carone / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Daniel Horowitz / Suzanne Miller0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKerry Espinola / Neal Sugg vs Jessenia Delos Santos / Eduardo Delossantos2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Jamie Hinckley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Jessica Sahoo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Sarah Butler
published
2.69
Kerry Espinola
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.30
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.08
Brenda Hardison
published 2.5
Neal Sugg
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jamie Hinckley
109W–139L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Jessica Sahoo
76W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
2.91
Sarah Butler
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Kerry Espinola
130W–131L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Brenda Hardison
12W–28L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Neal Sugg
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.