Teams

Ace Kickers

2021 40&Over Mixed · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-07vs Empire Strikes BackLost 03
L#1 DoublesBen Ryu / Rebecca Wehrle vs Michael Huh / Laura Emerson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Lakritz / Patricia Travers vs Daniel Zimmon / Soo Ji Park1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoshua Peters / Maribel Unanue vs Peter Ortiz / JAN NELSON4-6, 6-7
2021-07-31vs NJ: The 40 LovesLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnnika Ahlstrom / Joshua Peters vs Elena DeBarbadillo / Francois Fournier1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCecilia Sienra / Philip Lakritz vs Peter Snell / Hildi Todrin3-6, 3-6
2021-07-23vs Westchester Tennis Center: PonchosLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoshua Peters / Danielle Cawood vs Zhendong Zhang / Julia Cho5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesClint Tomlinson / Rebecca Wehrle vs Craig Spenner / Laura Emerson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKishore Chandrasekharan / Patricia Travers vs Bobby Choe / Wendy Boiardi4-6, 2-6
2021-07-10vs NJ: The 40 LovesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoshua Peters / Rebecca Wehrle vs Laura Gawley / Marijus Kuzavas4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesClint Tomlinson / Cecilia Sienra vs Marc Cohen / Lucia Gagnon1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBen Ryu / Astrid Kaiser vs Lars Bohn / Kristy Gilbert0-6, 1-6
2021-06-19vs Westchester Tennis Center: PonchosLost 03
L#1 DoublesKishore Chandrasekharan / Rebecca Wehrle vs Julia Cho / Brett Howard2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCecilia Sienra / Ben Ryu vs Bobby Choe / Edina Jung1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoshua Peters / Danielle Cawood vs Bobby Kim / JAN NELSON1-6, 2-6
2021-06-12vs NJ: The 40 LovesLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnika Ahlstrom / Philip Lakritz vs Marijus Kuzavas / Laura Gawley1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Travers / Joshua Peters vs Lars Bohn / Cecilia Orchard2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKishore Chandrasekharan / Astrid Kaiser vs Tony Ferrante / Jessica MacFarlane1-6, 4-6
2021-05-22vs Westchester Tennis Center: PonchosLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoshua Peters / Rebecca Wehrle vs Zhendong Zhang / Julia Cho2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKishore Chandrasekharan / Annika Ahlstrom vs Craig Spenner / Lily Riedel2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesClint Tomlinson / Danielle Cawood vs Peter Ortiz / Laura Emerson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-05-15vs NJ: The 40 LovesLost 03
L#1 DoublesClint Tomlinson / Cecilia Sienra vs Joseph Iwanski / Samantha Mulcahy1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaribel Unanue / Ben Ryu vs Deborah Antoine / Glenn Dykstra1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAstrid Kaiser / Joshua Peters vs Kristy Gilbert / Arthur Ferrante2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ: The 40 Loves6219513151
2Empire Strikes Back6217720189
3Ace Kickers0802448287

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Annika Ahlstrom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Danielle Cawood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Jennifer Desalvo
published
3.48
Joshua Peters
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.32
Clint Tomlinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Kishore Chandrasekharan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Rebecca Wehrle
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Maribel Unanue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Cecilia Sienra
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Astrid Kaiser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Travers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Philip Lakritz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clint Tomlinson + Cecilia Sienra4845% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Wehrle + Kishore Chandrasekharan123 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Wehrle + Joshua Peters033 matchesnot enough data
Kishore Chandrasekharan + Cecilia Sienra213 matchesnot enough data
Astrid Kaiser + Joshua Peters123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annika Ahlstrom
25W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Danielle Cawood
45W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.66
Jennifer Desalvo
9W–25L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
Joshua Peters
78W–91L career · 8 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Clint Tomlinson
192W–174L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
Kishore Chandrasekharan
88W–100L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Rebecca Wehrle
100W–117L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Maribel Unanue
134W–88L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Cecilia Sienra
57W–50L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Astrid Kaiser
35W–54L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Travers
22W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Philip Lakritz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.