Teams

Sports Mall-Kasteler/Smith

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W AM

20 players · average NTRP 4.29 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-30Won 20
W#1 SinglesLauren Hawley vs Cyndi Jones6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Marz / Jennifer Hathaway vs Christine Fotheringham / Alisa Gardner6-4, 6-1
2025-05-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Hawley vs Stephanie Walzer2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-12Won 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Hawley vs Chandi Hurd6-1, 6-1
2025-05-05Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLauren Hawley vs Meghan Clark4-6, 4-6
2025-04-28vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLauren Hawley vs Olivia Muir6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Hathaway / Linda Marz vs Jen Langston / Tanya Conrad4-6, 5-7
2025-04-21Split 11
W#1 SinglesLauren Hawley vs Cyndi Jones6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGretchen Soffe / Jennifer Hathaway vs Christine Fotheringham / Alisa Gardner2-6, 1-6
2025-04-07Split 11
W#1 SinglesLauren Hawley vs Chandi Hurd6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJaNae Smith / Jennifer Hathaway vs Debra Rawlings / Diana Granger3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Lauren Hawley
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Allison Rideout
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Ashley Park
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.22
Lynette Duran
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Karin Smith
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
4.15
Amber Jorgensen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Marissa Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.14
Casey Pickett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Jennifer Hathaway
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.94
Marie Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Alyson Ellis
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.91
Linda Marz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.83
Tiffany Kasteler
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.80
Teisa Linscott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Robyn Scharman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
JaNae Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Gretchen Soffe
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Regina Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Emma Heiden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Katie Zimmerman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JaNae Smith + Regina Johnson9456% games+10.1% vs expected
Lynette Duran + Karin Smith7166% games+9.5% vs expected
Teisa Linscott + Casey Pickett8162% games+8.9% vs expected
Ashley Park + Casey Pickett4356% games+6.9% vs expected
Lynette Duran + Marissa Jackson4160% games+3.6% vs expected
Lynette Duran + Jennifer Hathaway12955% games+3.1% vs expected
Robyn Scharman + Regina Johnson20955% games+3.1% vs expected
Regina Johnson + Marissa Jackson17457% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Hawley
121W–29L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Allison Rideout
23W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Ashley Park
104W–40L career · 13 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Lynette Duran
186W–144L career · 11 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
4.22
Karin Smith
141W–69L career · 10 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Amber Jorgensen
34W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Marissa Jackson
110W–41L career · 7 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Casey Pickett
184W–133L career · 6 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Jennifer Hathaway
65W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.95
Marie Roberts
49W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Alyson Ellis
179W–48L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4.5
Linda Marz
140W–118L career · 10 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
3.91
Tiffany Kasteler
167W–101L career · 16 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Teisa Linscott
170W–105L career · 12 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Robyn Scharman
118W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
4
JaNae Smith
221W–188L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Gretchen Soffe
79W–60L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Regina Johnson
124W–102L career · 8 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Emma Heiden
19W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Zimmerman
27W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.