Teams

PA Kunnen FWL A18-4.5M

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 4.5 M (5 player)

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-01-15vs WH Lager FWL A18-4.5MWon 21
L#1 DoublesDamien Arthur / Trent Pontious vs Bryan Knoll / Christopher Lowry4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Hilp vs Jeremy Andrick6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTyler Fedewa / Jesse DeBoer vs Scott Holley / Greg Watts7-5, 6-3
2022-01-08vs ML Klingel FWL A18-4.5MWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Stevens / Jesse DeBoer vs Fabio Casagrande / Jon Ezzo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAustin Brunner / Karter Klingenberg vs Daniel Stanley / Thomas Hamann6-1, 6-2
2021-12-19vs WH Lager FWL A18-4.5MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAustin Brunner / Ron Patrick vs Corey Lager / Simeon Darwick Birnbaum1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Hilp vs Kevin Collins6-4, 6-3
2021-12-18vs ML Klingel FWL A18-4.5MWon 20
W#1 DoublesDamien Arthur / Christopher Stevens vs Martin Birchmeier / Nathan Klingel3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJustin Beckstrom / Ron Patrick vs Fabio Casagrande / Daniel Stanley6-3, 6-3
2021-12-04vs MVH Brower FWL A18-4.5MWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Stevens / Jesse DeBoer vs Pierce Arangua / Derrick Velarde7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJohn Hilp vs Jason Wagenmaker4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNathan Kunnen / Ron Patrick vs Chuck Brower / Mark Hendrickson6-3, 6-0
2021-11-20vs WH Lager FWL A18-4.5MWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Brouwer / Justin Beckstrom vs Patrick Bruining / Corey Lager4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristopher Stevens vs Jeremy Andrick6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNathan Kunnen / Jesse DeBoer vs Kevin Collins / William Hodgman6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-11-06vs ML Klingel FWL A18-4.5MLost 12
L#1 DoublesAustin Brunner / Jesse DeBoer vs Austin Huynh / Joshua Gove3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Hilp vs Jorge Pena Marin6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNathan Kunnen / Trent Pontious vs Nathan Klingel / Maximilian Bauer4-6, 4-6
2021-10-23vs MVH Brower FWL A18-4.5MWon 21
L#1 DoublesTrent Pontious / Damien Arthur vs Pierce Arangua / Matthew Lantz6-7, 2-4
W#1 SinglesJohn Hilp vs Mark Hendrickson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Stevens / Jesse DeBoer vs Chuck Brower / Paul Hathaway6-1, 7-5
2021-09-11vs MVH Brower FWL A18-4.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesAustin Brunner / Christopher Stevens vs Matthew Lantz / Ben Lassanske1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRon Patrick vs Jarrod Brower2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTyler Fedewa / Karter Klingenberg vs Matthew Thatcher / Pierce Arangua3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WMI FWL A18&O 4.5 M (5 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PA Kunnen FWL A18-4.5M7218923209
2MVH Brower FWL A18-4.5M63151226218
3WH Lager FWL A18-4.5M36141330242
4ML Klingel FWL A18-4.5M2772042286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
John Hilp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.15
Austin Brunner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.02
Karter Klingenberg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Justin Beckstrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Trent Pontious
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Christopher Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.61
Damien Arthur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Ron Patrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jesse DeBoer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nathan Kunnen
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Tyler Fedewa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Damien Arthur + Trent Pontious11558% games+9.3% vs expected
Nathan Kunnen + Ron Patrick3549% games+9.0% vs expected
Christopher Stevens + Jesse DeBoer404 matchesnot enough data
Jesse DeBoer + Austin Brunner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Hilp
39W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.38
4.5
Austin Brunner
52W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Karter Klingenberg
38W–16L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
4.02
Justin Beckstrom
14W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.98
Trent Pontious
38W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Christopher Stevens
15W–7L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Damien Arthur
26W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
Ron Patrick
149W–100L career · 4 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
Jesse DeBoer
8W–4L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nathan Kunnen
12W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tyler Fedewa
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.