Teams

WH Lager FWL A18-4.5M

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 4.5 M (5 player)

10 players · average NTRP 4.40 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-01-15vs PA Kunnen FWL A18-4.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesBryan Knoll / Christopher Lowry vs Damien Arthur / Trent Pontious6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJeremy Andrick vs John Hilp1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesScott Holley / Greg Watts vs Tyler Fedewa / Jesse DeBoer5-7, 3-6
2021-12-19vs PA Kunnen FWL A18-4.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesCorey Lager / Simeon Darwick Birnbaum vs Austin Brunner / Ron Patrick6-1, 6-3
2021-12-18vs MVH Brower FWL A18-4.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristopher Lowry / Corey Lager vs Jarrod Brower / Jason Wagenmaker7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBryan Knoll vs Jaden Bender1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesScott Holley / Greg Watts vs Mark Hendrickson / Paul Hathaway6-7, 2-6
2021-12-11vs MVH Brower FWL A18-4.5MWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Eagle / Christopher Lowry vs Jaden Bender / Paul Hathaway2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCorey Lager / Greg Watts vs Pierce Arangua / Matthew Thatcher6-2, 6-3
2021-12-04vs ML Klingel FWL A18-4.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesCorey Lager / Christopher Lowry vs Austin Huynh / Joshua Gove6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGreg Watts / William Hodgman vs Brendan Childress / Jon Ezzo4-6, 2-6
2021-11-20vs PA Kunnen FWL A18-4.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatrick Bruining / Corey Lager vs David Brouwer / Justin Beckstrom6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJeremy Andrick vs Christopher Stevens3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKevin Collins / William Hodgman vs Nathan Kunnen / Jesse DeBoer7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2021-10-24vs ML Klingel FWL A18-4.5MWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Collins / Corey Lager vs Nathan Klingel / Brendan Childress6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJeremy Andrick vs Jorge Pena Marin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Eagle / Christopher Lowry vs Maximilian Bauer / Fabio Casagrande6-1, 7-5
2021-10-02vs ML Klingel FWL A18-4.5MWon 21
W#1 DoublesCorey Lager / Christopher Lowry vs Joshua Gove / Jon Ezzo6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBryan Knoll vs Austin Huynh4-3
W#2 DoublesKevin Collins / William Hodgman vs Thomas Hamann / Shiv Karunakaran6-1, 6-1
2021-09-26vs MVH Brower FWL A18-4.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Eagle / Bryan Knoll vs Pierce Arangua / Derrick Velarde6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJeremy Andrick vs Mark Hendrickson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Bruining / Greg Watts vs Jarrod Brower / Paul Hathaway1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WMI FWL A18&O 4.5 M (5 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PA Kunnen FWL A18-4.5M7218923209
2MVH Brower FWL A18-4.5M63151226218
3WH Lager FWL A18-4.5M36141330242
4ML Klingel FWL A18-4.5M2772042286

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Patrick Bruining
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.40
Bryan Knoll
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.39
Corey Lager
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.37
Christopher Lowry
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.29
David Eagle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Jeremy Andrick
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
3.86
Greg Watts
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
Scott Holley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Simeon Darwick Birnbaum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
William Hodgman
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Bruining + Corey Lager5265% games+5.1% vs expected
Christopher Lowry + Corey Lager6261% games+4.2% vs expected
Patrick Bruining + Greg Watts5263% games−0.5% vs expected
Christopher Lowry + David Eagle4155% gamesnot enough data
David Eagle + Corey Lager4157% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Lowry + Greg Watts033 matchesnot enough data
David Eagle + Patrick Bruining303 matchesnot enough data
David Eagle + Bryan Knoll303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Bruining
44W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Bryan Knoll
16W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Corey Lager
26W–12L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
4.39
4.5
Christopher Lowry
28W–13L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
David Eagle
33W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
Jeremy Andrick
77W–30L career · 9 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
4
Greg Watts
37W–22L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.86
Scott Holley
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Simeon Darwick Birnbaum
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
William Hodgman
17W–16L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.