Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW6.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-26vs CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC CW6.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesXinmeng Qiao / Lacy Zhu vs Molly Nam / Sandra Pelino4-6, 6-7
2025-10-16vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC CW6.5BWon 10
W#3 DoublesRenee Mercier / Kay Kolos McCubbin vs Helen Vasquez / Xuan Nguyen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesConnie Ea / Karen Treppa vs Debbie Hellmann / Stacy Woodworth6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRosalynd Zahiri / Amelia Spinrad vs Rachael Fagenson / Mary Phalon6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Chiang / Joanna Ha vs Holly Hewes / Marilyn Scully7-6, 6-2
2025-09-20vs LOS ALTOS GCC CW6.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesShanshan Chen / Lacy Zhu vs Claiborne Brown / Anne Gabrys4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesLang Lindsay / Patty Ly vs Isabella Feinberg / Kelsey Kraft4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMinh Cannon / Joanna Ha vs Vivian Flint / Meilan Liu7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMasha Graizer / Kristen Steinert vs Ann Easley / Cheri Cook6-0, 6-2
2025-09-13vs CLAREMONT R and S CW6.5BLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolden Svirsky / Connie Ea vs Olga Burkhina / Jennifer Shim1-6, 1-1
2025-09-07vs BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA CW6.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesEllen Xiao / Lacy Zhu vs Marnie Mar / Erna Nishime6-2, 6-3
2025-09-03vs BAY TREES PK CW6.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Petrov / Maryam Amini vs Alice Huynh / Gnaumie-Monique Valle3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Lang Lindsay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Diana Babayan
published 3.5
3.43
Robyn Schleifman
published 3.5
3.38
Minh Cannon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Amelia Spinrad
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.26
Julia Petrov
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Renee Mercier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Samantha Ng
published
3.12
Rosalynd Zahiri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Karen Treppa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
3.02
Connie Ea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Patty Ly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Maria Chiang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Lacy Zhu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Jing Wu
published
2.82
Joanna Ha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Tina Ly
published
2.78
Mary Roach
published
2.54
Kristen Steinert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Ng + Joanna Ha134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lang Lindsay
44W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
3.5
Diana Babayan
26W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Robyn Schleifman
169W–123L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Minh Cannon
61W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3
Amelia Spinrad
27W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.29
Julia Petrov
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
Renee Mercier
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Samantha Ng
29W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.13
3.5
Rosalynd Zahiri
94W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
Karen Treppa
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Marjan Gholamalipour
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Connie Ea
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Patty Ly
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Maria Chiang
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lacy Zhu
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Jing Wu
17W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.86
Joanna Ha
23W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.82
Tina Ly
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
Mary Roach
20W–24L career · no lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.78
Kristen Steinert
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%39%61%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.