Teams

Team 1 Wasan - Rapid Fire

2025 NOVA Combo Mixed · NOVA Combo Mixed 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-14vs Team 8 mckeel - PiF Nova X6.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesVikrant Arya / Katherine Loevinger vs Thomas McCrary / Nancy Rowland6-3, 2-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Hubona / Laura Schreeder Hubona vs Josh Snead / Lynne Dupuis6-3, 6-3
2025-11-09vs Team 7 Penunia - Love & Learn TennisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBe Tam / Parag Matalia vs Robert Ichiyama / JENNIFER JOY3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShiva Shahabadi / Vikrant Arya vs Mark Jensen / Johanne Maher7-5, 4-2
L#1 DoublesAndrew Kennedy / Melanie Bielski vs James Shevlin / Yolanda Tsai4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesParag Matalia / Be Tam vs Joyce Aramburu / David Schwartz6-2, 6-3
2025-10-19vs Team 4 Zhang - Topspin RiotLost 01
L#1 DoublesShiva Shahabadi / Parag Matalia vs Yucong Gao / Sean Yang1-6, 1-6
2025-10-13vs Team 3 Levine - RBGCC Mix 6.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesShiva Shahabadi / Vikrant Arya vs James Colucci / Tonya Turner6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMelanie Bielski / Hanh Tu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-07vs Team 2 CrenshawLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Bielski / Hanh Tu vs Vicky Bach / Frank Pan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Combo Mixed 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Martine Faga
published
3.00
Be Tam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Mari Markin
published
2.90
Shiva Shahabadi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Katherine Loevinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
David Loevinger
published 3
2.74
Melanie Bielski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Melissa Moore
published
2.70
Anita Wasan
published 3
Laura Schreeder Hubona
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Hubona
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vikrant Arya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martine Faga
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Be Tam
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.00
Mari Markin
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.91
3
Shiva Shahabadi
25W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Katherine Loevinger
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
David Loevinger
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Melanie Bielski
15W–30L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Melissa Moore
18W–28L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Anita Wasan
42W–69L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Laura Schreeder Hubona
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Hubona
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vikrant Arya
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.