Teams

Shot Sisters

2024 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.17 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-17vs Kiss My AceWon 32
L#1 DoublesMiranda Lenocker / Carie Confer vs Lauren Moore / Renee Pascale2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMelanie Thomas vs Lisa Nguyen4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDarlene Foster / Julie Stewart vs Kristi Nagode / Kelly Johnson7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAmy Pyles vs Diane Little6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShawn O'Brien / Marie Lyons vs Kristie Hodges / Elizabeth McCrackin6-1, 7-6
2024-06-10vs MoValley/Madden/18&over3.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesMichelle Holloway / Dawne Sullivan vs Wendy Madden / Avilone Doan3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSusan Lundy vs Sarah Patel0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Thomas / Julie Stewart vs Lucia Chavez / Dallas Miller1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLynn Neumeister / Brandi Shaw vs Leila Fadaiepour / Amy High1-6, 6-7
2024-06-03vs TD Academy 3.5Split 22
L#1 DoublesStacey Rigsby / Kari Munday vs Amy Laizure / Erica Martinez1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Pyles vs Sarai Baird6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCarie Confer / Miranda Lenocker vs Liz Adams / Bianca Modi6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Holloway / Susan Lundy vs Nancy Flaherty / Susan Bouzerand6-2, 6-2
2024-05-31vs Volley StarzLost 04
L#1 DoublesKari Munday / Stacey Rigsby vs Jill Raines / Gayle MacKenzie-Morain2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRika Burr vs Tiny Phan2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShawn O'Brien / Susan Lundy vs Valerie Oakley / Cindy Hendrick2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Ertel / Lynn Neumeister vs Tina Morehart / Kay Brezny0-6, 2-6
2024-05-20vs Match Point MamasWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynn Neumeister / Judith Ertel vs Susie Vesper / Lee Anne Stone7-6, 7-6
2024-05-13vs Get A GripWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynn Neumeister / Judith Ertel vs Barbara Black / Robyn Duginski6-3, 6-2
2024-04-08vs Red, White & BeautifulLost 01
L#3 DoublesLynn Neumeister / Judith Ertel vs Becky Johnson / Jennifer Dennis6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Carie Confer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Miranda Lenocker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Michelle Holloway
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Amy Pyles
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.12
Lynn Neumeister
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Marie Lyons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Dawne Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Rika Burr
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Darlene Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Judith Ertel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Melanie Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 8% · published
2.75
Kari Munday
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Julie Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Susan Lundy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Brandi Shaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kimberly Taylor
published
Shawn O'Brien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stacey Rigsby
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Lundy + Darlene Foster2349% games+2.9% vs expected
Lynn Neumeister + Julie Stewart4252% games+2.5% vs expected
Carie Confer + Miranda Lenocker491859% games+2.2% vs expected
Susan Lundy + Lynn Neumeister2745% games+2.0% vs expected
Kari Munday + Melanie Thomas7654% games+1.1% vs expected
Amy Pyles + Kimberly Taylor7357% games+0.5% vs expected
Michelle Holloway + Dawne Sullivan192050% games−0.8% vs expected
Lynn Neumeister + Brandi Shaw41142% games−2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carie Confer
76W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Miranda Lenocker
82W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.18
Michelle Holloway
47W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Amy Pyles
80W–39L career · 11 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
Lynn Neumeister
36W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Marie Lyons
38W–28L career · 1 line in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Dawne Sullivan
46W–40L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
Rika Burr
11W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Darlene Foster
36W–45L career · 1 line in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Judith Ertel
28W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Melanie Thomas
114W–90L career · 12 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
Kari Munday
53W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
Julie Stewart
16W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.74
Susan Lundy
31W–72L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Brandi Shaw
9W–46L career · 1 line in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kimberly Taylor
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shawn O'Brien
27W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacey Rigsby
12W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.