Teams

Abell

2022 St. Marys Adult 18 & Over · St. Marys Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-18vs Coker/WillhideLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Bishop / Jonathan Ferrell vs Jason Wynn / Trey Gladwell3-6, 2-6
2022-06-11vs Coker/WillhideWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Bishop / Jonathan Ferrell vs J Harris / Jake Heibel6-3, 6-2
2022-06-04vs Coker/WillhideLost 01
L#1 SinglesJonathan Ferrell vs John Jiang1-6, 3-6
2022-05-28vs Coker/WillhideLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Hayes / Jonathan Ferrell vs Campbell Hawkins / Clayton Coker0-6, 1-6
2022-05-26vs Coker/WillhideLost 01
L#2 SinglesJonathan Ferrell vs Clayton Coker1-6, 0-6
2022-05-21vs Coker/WillhideLost 01
L#2 SinglesJonathan Ferrell vs Todd Cervini1-6, 3-6
2022-05-19vs Coker/WillhideWon 10
W#2 SinglesJonathan Ferrell vs Bruce Willhide2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-12vs Coker/WillhideLost 01
L#2 DoublesJonathan Ferrell / Stephen Abell vs Campbell Hawkins / John Jiang6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for St. Marys Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
3.67
Kevin Findley
published
3.66
Stephen Pereira
published
3.66
Andrew Hayes
published 4
3.63
Giap Nguyen
published 4
3.63
Richard Bishop
published
3.57
Joseph Taylor
published
3.54
3.51
Russell Carrington
published
3.50
Stephen Abell
published
3.43
Thomas Swann
published
3.40
Jonathan Ferrell
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russell Carrington + Richard Bishop044 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Taylor + Richard Bishop123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Guillermo Guerrero
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Kevin Findley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Stephen Pereira
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Andrew Hayes
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Giap Nguyen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Richard Bishop
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.63
Joseph Taylor
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Joanthan Fallowfield
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Russell Carrington
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Stephen Abell
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
Thomas Swann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
4
Jonathan Ferrell
101W–197L career · 8 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.