Teams

Cottonwood Club-Barber

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 2.5W AM

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-03vs Wasatch Rec Center-KelleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Krejci / Kylee Bryson vs Sharilee Hill / Lisa Candland6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTam Pham / Kylee Bryson vs Stephanie Betteridge / Ruth Russell3-6, 3-6
2024-05-06vs Park City MARC-LlewellynLost 01
L#2 DoublesKylee Bryson / Tam Pham vs Megan Johnstone / Kim Li7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-29vs Liberty Park Tennis-JacksonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKylee Bryson / Jamie Tate vs Suzanne Kingsford / Sarah Whisenant6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Jane Woolley
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.24
Mary Diaz Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Amanda Krejci
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Alison Barber
published 3
2.63
Sara Turley
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.34
Kylee Bryson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Nelson
published
Tam Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Barber + Mary Diaz Gordon3354% games+12.2% vs expected
Amanda Krejci + Jane Woolley12559% games+10.4% vs expected
Mary Diaz Gordon + Jane Woolley6260% games+6.2% vs expected
Sara Turley + Amanda Krejci5848% games+1.0% vs expected
Mary Diaz Gordon + Sara Turley3256% gamesnot enough data
Kylee Bryson + Sara Turley033 matchesnot enough data
Kylee Bryson + Amanda Krejci213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Woolley
77W–34L career · 11 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Mary Diaz Gordon
108W–65L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Amanda Krejci
62W–55L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Alison Barber
16W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Sara Turley
45W–58L career · 7 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Kylee Bryson
21W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.34
Kristin Nelson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tam Pham
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.