Teams

Friends of Court

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-21vs Summer LOVEWon 10
W#2 DoublesErin Mascatello / Carol Druzbick vs Monique Berten / Waleska Altreuter6-4, 5-2
2022-07-14vs Team GevasWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Druzbick / Alison Duenkel vs Carrie Gray / Kassie Stewart6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJenelle Langen vs Suzanne Stroup6-2, 3-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Donaldson / Mairin Kuligowski vs Paula Garrison / Stephanie Peebles6-1, 6-2
2022-06-30vs Summer LOVESplit 11
W#1 SinglesJenelle Langen vs Maura Burke6-1, 5-3
L#2 DoublesErin Kaplan / Mairin Kuligowski vs Mary Hope / Teresa Plott3-6, 3-3
2022-06-16vs Team GevasWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Druzbick / Alison Duenkel vs Elizabeth Font / Alexis Martin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAudrey Zeidan / Mairin Kuligowski vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Erin Kaplan
published 4
3.71
Carol Druzbick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Gina Ryan
published 4
3.67
Jenelle Langen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.51
Mary Chlopecki
published
3.39
Paige Bartlett
published
3.17
Mairin Kuligowski
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Linda Donaldson
published
3.11
Boni Vinter
published 3.5
3.11
Audrey Zeidan
published 3.5
2.95
Diana Shevlin
published 3.5
Jennifer Hanna
published
Kate Wesley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Zeidan + Diana Shevlin1534% games−6.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin Kaplan
40W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Carol Druzbick
114W–102L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Gina Ryan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jenelle Langen
243W–115L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Mary Chlopecki
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Paige Bartlett
21W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Mairin Kuligowski
53W–77L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
Linda Donaldson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Boni Vinter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Audrey Zeidan
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Diana Shevlin
23W–16L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.95
Jennifer Hanna
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kate Wesley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.