Teams

Summer LOVE

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-21vs Friends of CourtWon 20
W#1 DoublesTeresa Plott / Kristen Schopp vs Mary Chlopecki / Heather Singley6-3, 4-3
W#1 SinglesLeigh Neary vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-07vs Team GevasWon 10
W#1 SinglesTeresa Plott vs Carrie Gray6-4, 4-1
2022-06-30vs Friends of CourtSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Hope / Teresa Plott vs Erin Kaplan / Mairin Kuligowski6-3, 3-3
L#3 DoublesWaleska Altreuter / Kristen Schopp vs Paige Bartlett / Jennifer Hanna4-6, 0-3
2022-06-28vs Team GevasWon 20
W#1 SinglesTeresa Plott vs Mary Berkowitz4-0
W#2 DoublesWaleska Altreuter / Kristen Schopp vs Kassie Stewart / Beth Taylor6-4, 5-4
2022-06-20vs Friends of CourtLost 01
L#2 DoublesWaleska Altreuter / Leigh Neary vs Gina Ryan / Kate Wesley1-6, 4-5
2022-06-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Ayoub / Leigh Neary vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Kim Klimkiewicz
published
Kristen Schopp
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Mary Hope
published
3.63
Teresa Plott
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Leigh Neary
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Maura Burke
published
3.33
Kristin Clark
published
3.27
Karen Hodges
published
3.21
Kathryn Welsh
published
3.20
Jennifer Ayoub
published
Waleska Altreuter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Hodges + Jennifer Ayoub5450% games−6.8% vs expected
Kristen Schopp + Teresa Plott3254% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Schopp + Leigh Neary224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Klimkiewicz
13W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Kristen Schopp
63W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Hope
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.69
4
Teresa Plott
117W–93L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Leigh Neary
36W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
Maura Burke
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
Kristin Clark
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.33
Karen Hodges
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Kathryn Welsh
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Jennifer Ayoub
12W–17L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Waleska Altreuter
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.