Teams

LCTA18/Ferez/DIC

STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Women 5.5 Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.08 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-28vs LCTA18/Miller/HamlinWon 21
L#1 DoublesCamila Gilsenan / ASHLEY ADORNO vs Youmna Squalli / Aimee Hoffman1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Ferez / Mary Ann DiMarco vs Jane Miller / Linda Carlson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Beth Elbe / Karen Hoehn vs Penny Portman / Jennifer Ford5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-08-21vs LCTA18/Cirifalco/Dunes WestWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Trost / Mary Beth Elbe vs Amanda Mammele / Pamela Lerner6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTiffany Ferez / Mary Ann DiMarco vs Teresa Hildebrand / Nicole Cirifalco6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRosa J McLaughlin / Jane Brown vs Melinda Zegas / Veronica Hein4-6, 4-6
2023-08-07vs LCTA18/Miller/HamlinWon 30
W#1 DoublesJan Finn / Jane Brown vs Emily Ulrich / Linda Carlson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCamila Gilsenan / Rosa J McLaughlin vs Youmna Squalli / Deena Hofstetter6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Trost / Cynthia Hubbard vs Robin Kopanski / Jennifer Ford1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-31vs LCTA18/Cirifalco/Dunes WestWon 21
L#1 DoublesCamila Gilsenan / Kathy Estey vs Neda Smith / Pamela Lerner2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulie Trost / Cynthia Hubbard vs Tamar Dessner / Melinda Zegas7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Peart / Rosa J McLaughlin vs Laurie Gamliel / Chloe Zegas6-2, 7-6
2023-07-19vs LCTA18/Cirifalco/Dunes WestWon 21
W#1 DoublesTiffany Ferez / Rosa J McLaughlin vs Nicole Cirifalco / Teresa Hildebrand6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Trost / Melody Hall vs Neda Smith / Donna Condon4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Peart / ASHLEY ADORNO vs Melinda Zegas / Tamar Dessner4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-07-17vs LCTA18/Miller/HamlinWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Trost / Rosa J McLaughlin vs Debbie Avinger / Jennifer Mather6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTiffany Ferez / Melody Hall vs Kristin Cheeseman / Linda Carlson6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Cline / Anne Olson vs Emily Ulrich / Susan Hancock1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Combo Women 5.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA18/Ferez/DIC6013515139
2LCTA18/Cirifalco/Dunes West249922185
3LCTA18/Miller/Hamlin1551326169

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Ann Harrah
published 4.5
3.43
Julie Trost
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Michelle Peart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Melody Hall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Rosa J McLaughlin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Camila Gilsenan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Jan Finn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Kathy Estey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
ASHLEY ADORNO
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.37
Mary Beth Elbe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Cynthia Hubbard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.07
Anne Olson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Judith Cline
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Hoehn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Ann DiMarco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tiffany Ferez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Peart + Rosa J McLaughlin21664% games+15.7% vs expected
Melody Hall + Rosa J McLaughlin4253% gamesnot enough data
Mary Ann DiMarco + Rosa J McLaughlin224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Beth Elbe + Melody Hall123 matchesnot enough data
Melody Hall + Michelle Peart303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ann Harrah
40W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.21
Julie Trost
74W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
Michelle Peart
69W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.98
Melody Hall
58W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
Rosa J McLaughlin
67W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Camila Gilsenan
51W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Jan Finn
20W–21L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Kathy Estey
26W–25L career · 1 line in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
ASHLEY ADORNO
29W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52
Mary Beth Elbe
37W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.37
2.5
Cynthia Hubbard
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Anne Olson
6W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Judith Cline
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Karen Hoehn
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mary Ann DiMarco
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tiffany Ferez
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.