Teams

V - North Ranch Shot Girls

2021 SoCal Tri-Level 18 &Over · Ventura - Women 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-10-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandra Jou / Natascha Crecion vs Tammy Morrell / Rachel Binns6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-10-03vs V - Sherwood Triple StarsLost 01
L#3 DoublesSilvia Benun / Natalie Bocchi-Friedman vs Nara Choi / Eileen Kakoyiannis3-6, 2-6
2021-09-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesNiki Sawyer / Kathy Ferrari vs Jane Clancy / Ana Gorman7-5, 6-2
2021-09-18vs V - Sunset Simply Smashing TriWon 10
W#3 DoublesSandra Jou / Amparo Rios-Davis vs Nadia Lucero / Inna Skripnikova6-3, 6-2
2021-09-12vs V - North Ranch - TRI OG'sLost 01
L#3 DoublesSilvia Benun / Sandra Jou vs Beatriz Rivera / Celeste Forster6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2021-08-25vs V - Sunset Thunder SistersLost 01
L#3 DoublesGeorgann Lott / Silvia Benun vs Jean Bridges / Gloria Liu6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
3.64
Hilary Muxlow
published 4
3.44
Natascha Crecion
published
Holly Culhane
published 3.5
3.15
Eda Rousselet
published 3.5
3.15
Sandra Jou
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Silvia Benun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Georgann Lott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Houri Kazanjian
published 3.5
3.00
Susan Friedman
published
2.69
Kathy Ferrari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maggie Ham
published
Wendy Dormer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Silvia Benun + Eda Rousselet1542% games+2.4% vs expected
Sandra Jou + Silvia Benun15857% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Morganson
70W–55L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Hilary Muxlow
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
Natascha Crecion
13W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Holly Culhane
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Eda Rousselet
18W–56L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Sandra Jou
184W–106L career · 3 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Silvia Benun
133W–128L career · 3 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Georgann Lott
63W–95L career · 1 line in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Houri Kazanjian
4W–13L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
Susan Friedman
9W–18L career · no lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Amparo Rios-Davis
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
Kathy Ferrari
57W–65L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Maggie Ham
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Dormer
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.