Teams

Isner/Strassell 3.5W 18s Mon AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-06vs Rike 3.5W 18s Mon AMWon 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Mary Beth Hartman7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2024-04-22vs Hughes/Harris 3.5W 18s Mon AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Dover / Layne Saunders vs Debbie Clancy / Amy Dulin6-1, 6-0
2024-04-15vs Herron/Berreth 3.5W 18s Mon AMWon 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Janet Fortney6-1, 6-1
2024-04-08Won 10
W#2 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Mickey Draper6-3, 6-0
2024-04-01vs Berlin/Hjelt 3.5W 18s Mon AMWon 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Leann Spencer6-0, 6-0
2024-03-25vs Mohorn/Harding 3.5W 18s Mon AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesLayne Saunders / Sara Strassell vs Heidi Gingerich / London Kern6-1, 6-0
2024-03-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Ashley Jones7-5, 6-2
2024-03-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Kathryn Campbell6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Layne Saunders
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.76
Morgan Hood
published
3.76
Sara Strassell
published
3.69
Julie Dover
published
3.56
Cj Isner
published 4
3.40
Missy Fields
published
3.36
Claire Cooke
published 3.5
3.35
Reeves Rhoten
published
3.29
Cameron Wannamaker
published 3.5
3.17
Claire Driscoll
published 3.5
3.14
Mary Dean
published
3.10
Jennifer Newkirk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cameron Wannamaker + Julie Dover213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Layne Saunders
153W–75L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Morgan Hood
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
3.76
Sara Strassell
27W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
Julie Dover
41W–22L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Cj Isner
22W–21L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Missy Fields
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Claire Cooke
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Reeves Rhoten
30W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Cameron Wannamaker
26W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Claire Driscoll
15W–27L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Mary Dean
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
Jennifer Newkirk
21W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.